Ordinary Meeting of Council
Wednesday 25 November 2020
4.00pm
Council Chambers
209 Comur Street, Yass
PRAYER:
All Stand:
Mayor: Let us be still and remember the presence of God. As we commence our meeting let us together pray for guidance and help.
All say together:
Almighty God, we ask your blessing upon this Council.
Direct and prosper our deliberations to the true welfare of Australia and the people of Yass Valley Amen.
|
FUTURE MEETINGS
December 2020
Wednesday 16th 4.00pm Ordinary Meeting of Council
|
Ordinary Meeting of Council
Open Forum Page No.
Webcasting
This meeting is being webcast, a reminder to those in attendance that you should refrain from making any defamatory statements.
Acknowledgement of Country
I acknowledge that we are meeting on the ancestral land of the Ngunnawal people. I recognise the Ngunnawal as the traditional custodians and pay respect to the Elders of the community and their descendants.
1. Prayer
2. Apologies
3. Declaration of Pecuniary Interests/Special Disclosures
4. Confirmation of Minutes
Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 28 October 2020.............................................. 5
6. Director of Planning & Environment Reports
6.1 Council Owned and Managed Land Assets........................................................................... 20
6.2 Yass Soldiers Club............................................................................................................... 43
6.3 Planning Proposal - 'Coolawin', 208 Sibley Road, Gundaroo.................................................. 52
6.4 Planning Proposal - Kyeema, Gundaroo............................................................................... 57
6.5 Development Consent No DA200049 - Subdivision, Isabel Drive, Murrumbateman................ 60
6.6 Development Application No DA190211 - Importation of Material for Internal Access Roads, 33 Hillview Drive, Murrumbateman.......................................................................................... 92
6.7 2020/21 Community Grants................................................................................................ 95
7. Director of Infrastructure & Assets Reports
7.1 Cloth Nappy Rebates.......................................................................................................... 99
7.2 Local Roads & Community Infrastructure Grant - Extension of Program............................... 100
8. Director of Corporate & Community Reports
8.1 1st Quarter Budget Review 2019/20.................................................................................. 104
8.2 Investment and Borrowings Report.................................................................................... 119
9.1 John Lewis Williams Bequest............................................................................................. 123
9.2 Water Rebate Application - Lot 7141 DP1095199 off Wee Jasper Road, Yass........................ 126
9.3 Tender Evaluation Report - Wellington Road Sewage Pump Station Tender RFQ 10014861... 127
9.4 Leasing of Council Property - 'Hawthorn', Barton Highway, Murrumbateman....................... 131
Nil
Nil
12. Minutes and Recommendations of Council Committees
12.1 Minutes of the General Manager's Performance Review held on 10 November 2020........... 132
12.2 Minutes of the Local Emergency Management Committee and Rescue Committee Meetings Held on 20 October 2020.......................................................................................................... 133
12.3 Minutes of the Canberra Region Joint Organisation Board Meeting held on 26 October 2020 139
12.4 Minutes of the Audit, Risk & Improvement Committee Meeting held on 27 October 2020... 149
12.5 Minutes of the Country Mayors Association held on 6 November 2020............................... 156
13. Confidential Matters.................................................................................................... 178
The following matters are classified as CONFIDENTIAL and will be considered in the Closed Meeting of Council in accordance with Section 10A(2) as they deal with commercial, personnel and legal matters:
13.1 Water Rebate Application - Lot 7141 DP1095199 off Wee Jasper Road, Yass........................ 178
13.2 Tender Evaluation Report - Wellington Road Sewage Pump Station Tender - RFQ 10014861. 178
13.3 Minutes of the General Manager's Performance Review Committee held on 10 November 2020........................................................................................................................................ 178
13.4 Leasing Council Property - 'Hawthorn', Barton Highway, Murrumbateman........................... 178
Close of Meeting Time
Chris Berry
GENERAL MANAGER
![]() |
Minutes of the
Ordinary Meeting of Council
Wednesday 28 October 2020
4.00pm
Council Chambers
209 Comur Street, Yass
Table of Contents
1. Prayer
2. Apologies
3. Declaration of Interest/Disclosures
4. Confirmation of Minutes
5. Mayoral Minute
Urgent Business .................................................................................................................. 4
7.6 Urgent business -Yass Swiming Club Carnival December 2020................................................. 4
6. Director of Planning & Environment Reports
6.1 Graffiti Art Proposal
6.2 Public Space Legacy Program
6.3 Development Application No. DA165280 - Highway Service Centre, Yass Valley Way, Yass
6.4 Development Application DA200184 - Dwelling and Two Lot Subdivision, 2 Rose Street, Murrumbateman
7. Director of Infrastructure & Assets Reports
7.1 Solar Panel Installation Proposal - Yass Water Treatment Plant, Yass Wastewater Treatment Plant and Yass Valley Council Depot
7.2 Tender Evaluation Report - Yass Sewer Relining Project YVC/IA/WWW/06.2020
7.3 Tender Evaluation Report - Design and Construction of Three Concrete Bridges YCC/ASS/05.2020
7.4 Tender Evaluation Report - Nanima Road Reconstruction (Stage 1 Ch 0-5km) YVC/ASS/07.2020
7.5 Scope of Works - Yass Valley Way Reconstruction YVC/ASS/03.2020
8. Director of Corporate & Community Reports
8.1 Investment and Borrowings Report
8.2 Rates Arrears
8.3 Policy Review
9. General Manager Reports
9.1 John Lewis Williams Bequest
9.2 Australia Day Awards Selection Panel
10. Notice of Motion
11. Questions with Notice
11.1 Questions with Notice - Cr Geoff Frost
12. Minutes and Recommendations of Council Committees
12.1 Minutes of the Bango Wind Farm Community Consultative Committee held on 18 August 2020
13. Confidential Matters
13.1 Tender Evaluation Report - Yass Sewer Relining Project YVC/IA/WWW/06.2020
13.2 Tender Evaluation Report - Design and Construction of Three Concrete Bridges YVC/ASS/05.2020
13.3 Tender Evaluation Report - Nanima Road Reconstruction (Stage 1 Ch 0-5km) YVC/ASS/07/2020
13.4 Scope of Works - Yass Valley Way Reconstruction YVC/ASS/03.2020
Presentations to Council – Items on the Meeting Agenda
·
Urgent item – Yass Swimming Club Carnival December 2020
Donna Wullaert
Presentation to Council
Police Presentation – Yass Local Area
Acting Inspector Dave Cowell
Council Meeting - The Deputy Mayor declared the meeting open at 4.56pm.
Present
Councillors Nathan Furry, Deputy Mayor, in the Chair Rowena Abbey, Mayor (via Zoom), Geoff Frost, Allison Harker, Jasmin Jones, Mike Reid and Kim Turner.
Also present were the General Manager – Chris Berry, Director of Planning & Environment – Julie Rogers, Interim Director of Infrastructure & Assets – Steven Beasley, Director of Corporate & Community – Mark Eady and Corporate Planning & Executive Support Officer – Shirree Garland.
Acknowledgement of Country
1. Prayer
2. Apologies
RESOLVED that apologies be received from Councillors Burgess and McManus and leave of absence be granted. (Reid/Frost) 165 |
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
Urgent Business
Motion
Reason
The matter is urgent as the November 2020 Council meeting will not give sufficient time for the Club to organise and promote the event.
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
RESOLVED that the urgent business be brought forward as the first report for consideration. (Frost/Harker) 167 |
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
3. Declaration of Interest/Disclosures
Councillor Abbey declared a significant, pecuniary conflict of interest in Item 6.3 - and stated that she believed her interest would preclude her from voting.
Reason: Councillor Abbey declared an interest as she is part owner of the land that is being sold for the development.
4. Confirmation of Minutes
RESOLVED that the minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 23 September 2020 resolution numbers 143-164 inclusive be taken as read and confirmed. (Turner/Reid) 168 |
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
5. Mayoral Minute
Nil
7.6 Yass Swiming Club Carnival December 2020
SUMMARY
In September 2020 the capacity of the Yass Swimming Pool was limited to 226 persons as a COVID-19 response. This limit did not address swimming carnivals. A request has been received from the Yass Swimming Club to hold a carnival on 6 December 2020 for 500 persons.
This limit has been reviewed in light of the club’s submission and it is recommended that the number of persons be limited to 265 (swimmers, spectators and officials) for swimming carnivals at the Yass pool including the Yass Swimming Club carnival on 6 December 2020.
1. The number of persons for all swimming carnivals at the Yass Swimming Pool complex be limited to 300 persons (including swimmers, spectators and officials). 2. For the swimming carnival on 6 December 2020 the number of persons at the Yass Swimming Pool complex be limited to 300 persons (including swimmers, spectators and officials) in accordance with the Yass Swimming Club’s COVID Safety Plan. 3. To minimise the social distancing risk the event be conducted in accordance with the Yass Swimming Club’s COVID Safety Plan. 4. The Yass Swimming Pool complex be closed to the general public for the full day on 6 December 2020 to allow the end of event cleaning of the facility by the Yass Swim Club. (Turner/Reid) 169 |
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner AGAINST: Nil |
6. Director of Planning & Environment Reports
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
At 05:50 pm Councillor Abbey left the meeting.
FOR: Councillors G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
At 05:54 pm Councillor Abbey returned to the Meeting.
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
7. Director of Infrastructure & Assets Reports
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
8. Director of Corporate & Community Reports
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
9. General Manager Reports
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
10. Notice of Motion
Nil
11. Questions with Notice
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
12. Minutes and Recommendations of Council Committees
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
13. Confidential Matters
FOR: Councillors R Abbey, G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
Closed Council commenced at 6.25 pm.
At 06:25 pm Councillor Abbey left the meeting.
13.1 Tender Evaluation Report - Yass Sewer Relining Project YVC/IA/WWW/06.2020
|
SUMMARY This report provides information on the submission of tenders for the 2020/21 Yass Sewer Relining Project. |
1. The tender submitted by Interflow Pty Ltd for the Yass Sewer Relining Project (Contract No: YVC/IA/WWW/06.2020) be accepted for a total cost of $257,880.22 (ex GST); inclusive of a Provisional Sum of $52,887.56 (ex GST) in accordance with Interflow Pty Ltd’s tender documentation, addendum, submission and subsequent clarifications. 2. The General Manager (or delegate) be authorised to execute the Contract documentation necessary for the works and to approve any necessary variations in accordance with the contract. 3. The original budget estimate for the project be increased from $200,000 to $260,000 at the next Quarterly Budget Review. 4. The unsuccessful tenderers be advised of the tender evaluation decision. (Frost/Turner) 187 |
FOR: Councillors G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
13.2 Tender Evaluation Report - Design and Construction of Three Concrete Bridges YVC/ASS/05.2020
|
SUMMARY This report provides advice on the submission of tenders for the design and construction of three concrete bridge structures. |
RESOLVED that the tender submitted by Complete Civil Pty Ltd to undertake the design and construction of the three concrete road bridges (Contract No. YVC/ASS/05.2020) be accepted for a total cost of $1,093,590. (Turner/Frost) 188 |
FOR: Councillors G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
13.3 Tender Evaluation Report - Nanima Road Reconstruction (Stage 1 Ch 0-5km) YVC/ASS/07/2020
|
SUMMARY This report provides advice on the submission of tenders for the Nanima Road Reconstruction (Stage 1 - Ch 0-5km). |
1. The tender submitted by Denrith Pty Ltd to undertake Nanima Road Reconstruction (Stage 1 Ch 05km) (Contract no. YVC/ASS/07.2020) be accepted for a total cost of $2,631,354.22 2. A contingency of $200,000 be allocated for latent conditions and unsuitable material. (Reid/Frost) 189 |
FOR: Councillors G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
13.4 Scope of Works - Yass Valley Way Reconstruction YVC/ASS/03.2020
|
SUMMARY This report seeks the allocation of surplus grant funding associated with the rehabilitation of Yass Valley Way to extend the scope of works under Contract No YVC/ASS/03.2020. |
RESOLVED that the scope of works for Yass Valley Way Reconstruction Tender YVC/ASS/03.2020 be increased to include additional rehabilitation sites on Yass Valley Way and the extension of the approaches of Old Gap Road to Yass Valley Way to seal to the RFS shed at a total additional cost of $360,000. (Turner/Frost) 190 |
FOR: Councillors G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
RESOLVED that the meeting move into Open Council. (Reid/Jones) 191 |
FOR: Councillors G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
Open Council resumed at 6.31 pm.
RESOLVED that the recommendations in Closed Council be adopted. (Turner/Frost) 192 |
FOR: Councillors G Frost, N Furry, A Harker, J Jones, M Reid and K Turner
AGAINST: Nil
Ordinary Council Meeting 25 November 2020
6.1 Council Owned and Managed Land Assets
SUMMARY
A review has been undertaken of land assets which Council either owns or manages on behalf of others. This report makes recommendations in relation to land which is potentially surplus to Council operational or community requirements.
That: 1. The recommendations in Table 1 for properties 1-24 be endorsed. 2. The preparation of a Yass Valley Open Space Strategy be included in the 2021/22 Operational Plan.
|
Financial IMPLICATIONS
The retention or disposal of Council owned property has varying implications depending on its current or any proposed future use. Not only does the value of the land need to be considered, but any income received from leases as well as costs associated with maintenance or remediation of the land.
POlicy & Legislation
· Local Government Act 1993
· Yass Valley Local Environment Plan 2013
· Property Acquisition and Disposal Policy
REPORT
1. Introduction
A review was recently undertaken of land assets which are either owned or managed by Council. This involved:
· Confirming the land classification (Operational or Community) under the Local Government Act 1993
· Confirming the land use zoning under the Yass Valley LEP 2013
· Reviewing Deposited Plans for any restrictions or reserve status
· Determining whether a current lease is in place for the land
Land which has been classified as Community Land under the Local Government Act 1993 cannot be sold or exchanged, and any lease entered into needs to be expressly provided for within the Plan of Management for the land.
As such, any Community Land which is identified as potentially surplus to requirements will be required to be reclassified as Operational Land through a Planning Proposal and associated public hearing with the community.
2. Property Acquisition & Disposal Policy
Council’s Property Acquisition & Disposal Policy provides a framework for property acquisition or disposal. It is noted that most of the land identified within this review was acquired prior to the development of this policy, and was unlikely to be assessed against any specified criteria. The policy requires Council to undertake regular reviews of its property portfolio, with the objective of minimising cost and maximising usage of land for the benefit of the community now and into the future.
The policy requires the value of each property to be assessed against operational, strategic and commercial value criteria and a summary has been provided below:
2.1 Operational Value
Council service/s cannot (or would struggle to) function effectively without this property or public amenity and would be detrimentally impacted without the property e.g. Council offices, carparks, community halls, parks, sporting facilities, water, sewerage, waste, recreational open space, playgrounds etc.
Parts of the Chinamans Creek Carpark have operational value in the form of amenity and connectivity values of the creek. Council has recently committed to progressing the Chinamans Creek Interpretive and Education Trail and Wetlands if funding is secured through the NSW Public Space Legacy Program. As discussed in the table below, if it is agreed to dispose of the parcel at the rear of the Yass Soldiers Club, it should be on the basis of an exchange of a strip of land to ensure this section of Chinamans Creek is in contiguous public ownership.
Part of the carpark also provides access to the rear of some businesses fronting Comur Street. For this reason, these lots are recommended to be retained at this time. Should there be a future redevelopment of the Atherfield Medical Centre, rights of way/easements to each business could be revisited at that time, with a view to adjusting boundaries. In the interim the land needs to remain in Council’s ownership.
Council has also been historically responsible for management of the Mullion Old School House and the Yass Senior Citizens’ Hall. As there is no operational need for this arrangement to continue, and these facilities duplicate other facilities within the immediate area in Council ownership, there is no operational need to continue these arrangements.
2.2 Strategic Value
Property held for future operational need, commercial value or future community enhancement
‘Hawthorn’, Murrumbateman has strategic value for the future growth of Murrumbateman as identified within the Yass Valley Settlement Strategy. It also has the potential to deliver future community benefit through the conservation of areas with high biodiversity values and some heritage structures and landscape on the Hawthorn property. In August 2020 Council determined to proceed with strategic bio certification of ‘Hawthorn’, as this will deliver future commercial and community benefit.
Land that is a Public Reserve and/or actively being used for that purpose needs to be considered as part of a holistic Public Open Space Strategy. Only land which has no infrastructure and not actively or likely to be used as open space has been identified within this review.
Other than the above, the main ‘strategic value’ which was considered was the commercial value of the asset and how leasing, retaining or disposing land may facilitate Council realising its other strategic objectives.
2.3 Commercial Value
Properties that do not have a strategic or operational component
Where the Valuer General’s land value is known it is provided in the table below, as well as the details of any current return being received through a lease. The Valuer General’s assessment is the unimproved land value – it is not the market value. Prior to the disposal of any parcels of land, an independent valuation will be required.
A number of parcels of land require additional works to be undertaken prior to re-development or lease/disposal of the land including land surveys or remediation. The cost and scope of these works is unknown at this stage, however it has been identified that there is a need to establish a budget reserve to manage (including remediate) Council owned land. As such, no timing has been attributed to these works, other than a low-medium-high priority, and the funding of each of these will be considered within the annual budget process once cost estimates are known.
2.4 Disposal of Property
The policy provides for the disposal of land not required for a community or operational purpose i.e.
· Open market sale (including auction)
· Expressions of interest
· Select tender
· Open tender
· By negotiation
The method chosen will depend upon:
· The number of known potential purchasers of the property
· Delegation limits, taking into consideration accountability, responsibility, operational efficiency and urgency of the disposal
· The total estimated value of the disposal
· Compliance with statutory and other obligations
As required under the policy, information relating to valuation, sale price and rationale for method of disposal will be made public through a resolution of Council.
3. Identified land
Based on the above considerations, the review revealed a number of parcels which appear no longer meet Council’s operational and strategic land needs or which require additional work to be undertaken to allow the land to be re-developed, leased or sold. These are included and number 1-24 in Table 1 below. The corresponding aerial photo of each property is shown in Attachment A.
Land Description |
Valuer General Value 1/7/2019 (Pro Rata where part of larger valuation) |
Lease Income/ Expenditure |
Recommendation |
Priority |
OPERATIONAL LAND |
||||
1 Former Yass Saleyards, Yass Valley Way, Yass Lot 1 DP230230, Lot 1 DP328041, Lot 1 DP323783 Zoned R1 General Residential 4.6ha |
$360,000 |
N/A |
Obtain quote for site remediation. Include funding for remediation in a forthcoming budget.
|
Medium |
2 ‘Hawthorn’, Barton Highway, Murrumbateman Lot 12 DP1129955 Lot 6 DP1046081 Lot 11 DP1129955 Zoned RU1 Primary Production 286ha |
$3,170,000 |
$60,000 pa Lease to be renewed early 2021 |
Continue with strategic bio certification as per August 2020 resolution. |
High |
3 116 Laidlaw Street, Yass Lot 1 DP783758 Zoned B5 Business
|
$482,000 |
$24,700 pa Lease expires 20 August 2021 |
Obtain quote for contaminated land/UPSS site assessment. Include funding for assessment in a forthcoming budget. Proceed with existing Development Consent for subdivision of Orion Street extension in 2021. After this consider whether to continue leasing or dispose. |
Medium |
4 Corner Red Hill and Bowning Road, Bowning Lot 101 DP1223128 Zoned RU5 Village 1,148m2 |
$73,800 |
N/A |
Engage surveyor to prepare boundary adjustment to address building/fence encroachment. Include funding for survey work in a forthcoming budget. Dispose upon registration of adjusted boundary. |
High |
5 17 Dutton St, Yass (rear Goodradigbee Centre) Lot 1 DP61675 Zoned R3 Medium Density Residential 689m2 |
$73,162 (pro rata) |
N/A |
Obtain quote for contaminated land assessment. Include funding for assessment in a forthcoming budget. Dispose upon completion of remediation |
Medium |
6 Future extension of Saxon Avenue, Murrumbateman Lot 4 DP854301 Zoned R5 Large Lot Residential 6,810m2 |
$58,911 (pro rata) |
N/A |
Road extension not required into (recent) Isabel Drive development. Obtain valuation and negotiate/ seek Expressions of Interest from adjacent owners including Merryville Community Association. |
High |
7 9-13 Dutton Street, Yass Lot 9 DP1099562 Lot 10 DP1107012 Lot 11 Sec 19 DP759136 Lot 12 Sec 19 DP759136 Zoned R3 Medium Density Residential 7,265m2 (total) |
$537,666 |
N/A |
Undertake structural/heritage assessment on Squatter’s Home Inn ruins in 2020-21. Obtain quote for contaminated land assessment. Include funding for assessment in a forthcoming budget. Review occupation of Lot 12 and prepare formal lease of site if appropriate. Progress creation and acquisition of strip of land at rear from NSW Land Registry (not in any ownership). Depending on outcome of above assessments dispose of Lots 9, 10 and 11. |
Medium |
8 Chinamans Creek Carpark, Yass |
Lot 4 DP 557069 $122,196 (pro rata)
Lot 5 DP 559028 $19,541 (pro rata) |
N/A |
Obtain valuations and negotiate/seek Expression of Interest from adjacent landowner for Lot 5 DP559028 (adjoins rear of Bargain Base /Elders building). Discussion: Lot 5 is not relied on to access any other businesses in the vicinity and forms part of the rear loading and parking area to the adjacent premises. Obtain valuation and negotiate/seek Expression of Interest from the adjacent landowner, the Yass Soldiers Club for Lot 4 DP557069. Discussion: The Soldiers Club land holding abuts the north west and north east boundaries of the site. They have previously expressed an interest in acquiring this lot for car parking purposes (refer separate report). Lot 4 is currently underutilised by surrounding businesses and the general community. It is not relied on to access any other businesses in the vicinity. Any disposal of Lot 4 DP557069 should incorporate an
exchange of the strip of land which includes the channelised section of
Chinamans Creek between Meehan Street and the rear of the Australian Hotel
(part Lot 5 Section 21 DP759136, Part Lot 100 DP1134246). In addition, there would be significant community benefit in creating continuous public pedestrian access from Park and Ride to Riverbank Park. This will also assist the delivery of the Chinamans Creek Interpretive and Education Trail and Wetlands project under the current Public Space Legacy Program. Lot 2 DP503355 and Lot 8 DP562963 contain the Atherfield medical centre/ part Australian Hotel carpark (accommodation). While they predominantly support those businesses, they also provide access from Lead Street to the rear of Carpet Court, Belle Mere, Lien’s and Silver Gully businesses. It also has right of ways/easements over Lot 2 which would be costly and complex to resolve. It is recommended that these lots, and well as the two lots over Chinamans Creek, be retained by Council at this time. |
|
9 West corner Grampian and O’Brien St, Yass Lot 1 DP1087704 Zoned R1 General Residential 1,011m2 |
$139,000 |
N/A |
Not a designated reserve, however due to location and passive function consider any need to remain in public ownership within proposed Open Space Strategy. |
Low |
10 End of Grevillea Close, Murrumbateman Lot 3 DP812518 Zoned R5 Large lot Residential 1,998m2 |
$12,900 |
N/A |
Not required for extension of road network or access to lots to north. Obtain valuation and negotiate/seek Expressions of Interest from adjacent owners. |
Medium |
11 Corner Hadlow Drive & Brooks Creek Lane, Gundaroo Lot 1 DP544857 Zoned RU1 Primary Production 974m2 |
$3,610 |
N/A |
Ascertain interest and negotiate with adjacent owner to acquire. |
Low |
12 Faulder Avenue, Yass (north of Transfer Station) Lot 5 DP582330 (part) Zoned B5 Business Development 3.155 ha |
$52,426 (pro rata) |
N/A |
Undertake updated biodiversity assessment. Engage consultant/ surveyor to prepare a Development Application for subdivision (7 lot plus road, plus expansion area for Transfer Station. Between Faulder Avenue and spur rail line only.) Obtain quote for updated biodiversity assessment and subdivision proposal for land between Faulder Ave and tram line only. Include funding for finalising subdivision application in a forthcoming budget. |
High |
13 67 Rossi St, Yass - (Goodradigbee Centre) Lot 8 DP1132197 (part) Zoned B2 Local Centre |
$214,838 (pro rata for all of lot 8)) |
$26,000 pa Lease with Valmar over Goodradigbee Building, parking area and carport only |
Engage consultant/surveyor to prepare Development Application for a 2 lot subdivision separating Goodradigbee building from adjacent sheds. Include funding for survey and consultancy work in a forthcoming budget. Upon registration of plan, obtain valuation and seek expressions of interest or undertake open market sale for lot occupied by sheds. |
High |
14 Gasworks, Dutton Street, Yass Lots 13,15,16 Sec 19 DP759136 Lot 14 DP1130367 Zoned SP1 Special Activities 4,578m2 |
$207,334 (pro rata) |
$50 pa
|
Include contaminated land monitoring as required under current EPA Voluntary Management Plan in forthcoming budget. Review and update existing lease of site. |
High |
COMMUNITY LAND |
||||
15 Stage 3 Discovery Drive, Yass Lot 63 DP1079585 Zoned R1 General Residential 8,428m2 |
$53,600 |
N/A |
Reclassify to Operational Land. Engage consultant/ surveyor to prepare modification to development consent, replacing road extension with cul-de-sac head and pedestrian/cycle path to Reddall Street. Include funding for survey and consultancy work in a forthcoming budget. Upon registration of plan, obtain valuation and seek expressions of interest or undertake open market sale for lots. |
High |
16 Discovery Drive Reserves, Yass Lots 9 and 19 DP1071431 Zoned R1 General Residential 842m2 and 705m2 |
$130,300 |
N/A |
Include preparation of an Open Space Strategy within next Operational Plan. Determine whether need to retain both areas of open space opposite each other.
|
Low |
17 Yeo Crescent, Yass Lot 20 DP813992 Zoned RE1 Public Recreation |
$268,000 |
N/A |
Include preparation of an Open Space Strategy within next Operational Plan. Determine need to retain given no recreational infrastructure on site and proximity to Walker Park. |
Medium |
18 Cnr Discovery Drive and Cooks Hill Road, Yass Lot 4 DP1071431 Zoned R1 General Residential 5,958m2 |
$51,100 |
N/A |
Determine interest in the land from Onerwal LALC. May be some development potential on eastern part of lot – (excluding Rocky Knoll) however new Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment will be required to demonstrate this. |
Medium |
19 Walker Park, Yass Lot 1 DP 163390 (part) Zoned RE1 Public Recreation 7 ha |
$235,385 |
$618.80 pa (2020/21) Lease Expiry Date: 30 July 2023 |
Include preparation of an Open Space Strategy within next Operational Plan. Undertake preliminary Biodiversity assessment to determine values present.
Determine whether part of lot which is currently fenced and leased is required to remain as open space. |
Medium |
20 Merriman Drive, Yass Lot 1 DP862942 (part) Zoned RE1 Public Recreation |
$87,000 (pro rata for all of Lot 1) |
N/A |
Include preparation of an Open Space Strategy within next Operational Plan. Determine whether part of lot adjacent to existing residential development is required to remain as open space. |
Low |
21 Woods Close, Murrumbateman Lot 14 DP832243 Zoned R5 Large Lot Residential 6,808m2 |
$65,800 |
$211.40 pa (2020/21) Lease Expiry Date: 30 June 2023 |
Include preparation of an Open Space Strategy within next Operational Plan. Although this was created as a Public Reserve as part of the subdivision, it is leased to the adjoining landowner. Determine whether need to retain.
|
Medium |
22 Wee Jasper village Lot 14 DP255410 Zoned part RU5 Village part W1 Waterway 4.53ha |
$18,300 |
$247.40 pa (2020/21) Lease Expiry Date: 30 June 2023 |
Include preparation of an Open Space Strategy within next Operational Plan. Although this was created as a Public Reserve as part of the subdivision, it is leased to the adjoining landowner. Determine whether any need to retain. |
Medium |
YVC LEASE or TRUSTEE FOR |
|
|||
23 Senior Citizens’ Hall, Yass Lot 2 DP523871
|
Purchased in 1967 with funds provided by Yass Senior Citizens’ Club. Land and facility is within the APEX facility. |
Note: Senior Citizens Club pays no rates and charges are waived under current Donations Policy. |
As Council does not manage nor maintain the Hall, the Trust should be extinguished and handed back to Yass Senior Citizen’s Club. |
Medium |
24 Old Mullion Schoolhouse Lot 258 DP821085 Lot 139 DP751834 Zoned RU1 Primary Production 9,394m2 |
N/A |
Lease with NSW Education expired in 2009. Minimal community use of the building/land, and there is another community hall on Council land nearby. |
Advise NSW Education that Council has no further interest in the property. |
High |
Key Pillar 4. Our Infrastructure
CSP Strategy IN4 - Maintain and update existing community facilities, and support the development of new community infrastructure as needed
Delivery Program Action IN4.2 - Ensure sufficient land is appropriately located for future Council facilities and emergency services
Operational Plan Activity IN4.2.1 - Ensure that as settlement grows locations are appropriately earmarked for Council facilities and emergency services
ATTACHMENTS: a. Aerial Photos of Properties ⇩
6.1 Council Owned and Managed Land Assets
Attachment a Aerial Photos of Properties
Aerial Photos- Council Owned & Managed Land
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
8.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
SUMMARY
To present a request to purchase Council owned land at the rear of the Yass Soldiers Club. It is recommended that an exchange of land be negotiated.
That negotiations be undertaken with the Yass Soldiers Club for the exchange of Lot 4 DP557069 at the rear of the Club for part Lot 100 DP1134246 and part Lot 5 Sec 21 DP759136 along Chinamans Creek. |
Financial IMPLICATIONS
Disposal of assets reduces Council’s asset maintenance liabilities.
POlicy & Legislation
· Local Government Act 1993
· Regional Community Strategic Plan 2016-36, Delivery Program 2017-21 and Operational Plan 2020-21.
· Yass Valley Local Environmental Plan 2013
· Property Acquisition & Disposal Policy
REPORT
1. Introduction
A request has been received from the Yass Soldiers Club to purchase Council land at the rear of their site in Meehan Street (refer Attachment A). The Club are seeking to use the land for parking purposes and would integrate this area with their existing car park by removal of the existing barriers. The Club has not made a purchase offer at this stage.
The site forms part of several Council owned parcels in this locality (refer Attachment B). The Council land and current uses are summarised in the following table:
Land |
Use |
Lot 2 DP503355 |
· Car park area accessed off Lead Street. · Provides rear access to commercial properties fronting Comur Street |
Lot 1 DP745721 Lot 11 DP603281 |
· Part of Chinamans Creek |
Lot 8 DP562963 |
· Access way at the rear of the Australia Hotel linking the car park area off Lead Street with the land at the rear of the Yass Soldiers Club |
Lot 4 DP557069 |
· Unformed informal access area · Provides rear access to adjoining commercial properties (Bargain Base, Elders) |
Lot 5 DP559028
|
· Unformed informal parking area · Adjoining rear of Yass Soldiers Club |
The Council land is classified as “Operational Land’ under the Local Government Act 1993 in recognition of its parking and access functions.
2. Decision Making Process
Council develops forward plans for its activities to guide future decision making. A review of Council’s land holdings has been identified as a project to determine whether the holdings align with its strategic priorities. Work on this project has commenced and priorities identified are included in a separate report in these business papers.
However there are times outside of the usual planning process in which strategic opportunities arise that warrant evaluation. To assist with this evaluations Council endorse a flowchart for such proposals i.e.
The evaluation of the Yass Soldiers Club proposal is to follow this process.
3. Legislation
Section 8A Local Government Act 1993 specifies the guiding principles for Councils which includes managing land and other assets so that current and future community needs can be met in an affordable way. There is an expectation that the acquisition or disposal of land follows a robust business case analysis. The disposal of Council land at the rear of the Yass Soldiers Club needs to follow this process and needs to consistent with Council’s strategic priorities.
4. Regional CSP, Delivery Program and Operational Plan
The disposal of surplus land is not specifically referenced in Council’s Regional CSP, Delivery Program or Operational Plan. These strategic documents make a broad reference to:
· CSP Strategy IN4 – maintain and upgrade existing community facilities and support development of new community facilities
· DP IN4.2 - Ensure sufficient land is appropriately located for future Council facilities and emergency services
Matching property assets with the need for community facilities is consistent with meeting these aspirational objectives. Assets that do not meet these needs can be considered as surplus and suitable for disposal.
5. Local Planning
The land is zoned ‘Local Centre’ under the Yass Local Environmental Plan 2013 and is located within a Heritage Conservation Area. The site itself has no heritage values.
Water, sewer and stormwater infrastructure in the area is included in Attachment C.
6. Councillor Workshop
A Councillor Workshop was held on 12 October 2020 to discuss its property portfolio and its alignment with its strategic priorities.
The workshop examined the Council land between Lead Street and the rear of the Yass Soldiers Club. The land provides for off street parking, rear access for commercial properties and Chinamans Creek.
Part of Chinamans Creek is owned by the Yass Solders Club.
Council has recently nominated the development of Chinamans Creek as an open space/stream restoration project for open space funding.
One option could be to exchange land between the Club and Council to secure public land along the creek.
The Council land also has an important access function for adjoin commercial properties and to allow vehicle and pedestrian movements between each parking area. This access will need to be retained with any transfer of Council land.
7. Property Acquisition & Disposal Policy
Council has adopted a Property Acquisition & Disposal Policy. This policy details the criteria for property disposal. An assessment against this criteria is as follows:
7.1 Usefulness of the property
The land was most likely acquired for cark parking however it has not been constructed for this purpose.
The area is used informally for parking and rear access to adjoining commercial properties.
7.2 Opportunity to promote economic growth and development
If purchased by the Club this land would assist that organisation with growth and development of their business.
7.3 Opportunity to deliver social and community benefits
The Club has indicated they wish to use the area for parking and are prepared to develop it for this purpose.
The parking design will need to ensure the site continues to provide rear access to adjoining commercial properties and integrate with other Council land.
An alternative option is to exchange land with the Club to secure contiguous public land for the Chinamans Creek project.
7.4 Current market value
An independent valuation has not yet been sought at this stage. However based on Council records of land values the site has an estimated value of $122,196.
7.5 Maintenance costs
The site is currently unformed and is receiving no maintenance.
7.6 Alternative future use
The site appears to have been acquired for future parking and has been used informally for this purpose along with rear access to adjoining commercial properties.
At this stage the development of the site as a car park has not been identified as a priority.
If the Club acquired the land for parking this could be an alternate means of achieving the same outcome. In addition the Club would become responsible for ongoing maintenance of the parking area.
7.7 Duplication of the property
The land is adjacent to an existing parking area off Lead Street. While the existing parking area is well used it in not operating at full capacity suggesting that additional parking in not yet required.
7.8 Impact of the disposal on the community
The submitted proposal is to use the land for car parking in association with the Club. This will be primarily for the benefit of the Club patrons.
As the area also provides rear access to adjoining commercial properties any disposal of the Council land should include appropriate ongoing access rights (e.g. carriageway access easements).
The design of the car park should also provide for integration into the existing car park off Lead Street.
7.9 Cultural/Heritage significance
The land is located within the Heritage Conservation Area but in itself has no cultural or heritage significance.
7.10 Impact of disposal on operations
Disposing of the land reduces Council’s asset management liability.
If the Club acquires the site for parking purposes it should be designed to maintain access to the adjoining commercial properties and integrate with the adjoining car park area.
Any proceeds from the sale can be added to the Infrastructure Replacement Reserve for future asset management.
7.11 Long term plan
There are currently no long terms plans for the site.
7.12 Benefits and risks
As the site is ‘land locked’ there are limited potential purchasers. If there are no Council long term plans then ideally the land would be best used in conjunction with an adjoining property.
7.13 Community consultation
No formal community consultation has been undertaken other than the approach by the Club.
Seeking Expressions of Interest from adjoining owners will provide an opportunity for all to compete for the land.
7.14 Restriction
Any disposal of the land should be conditional upon preserving rear access to adjoin properties. If the area is to be used for parking this should be designed to integrate with nearby parking.
8. Method of Disposal
The land being sought by the Club is at the rear of their existing premises and has no direct road frontage. Access to the area is via adjoining Council owned land. The land also provides rear access for adjoining commercial properties.
The acquisition of land over Chinamans Creek (refer Attachment D) to provide a contiguous public land holding over this watercourse for the upcoming open space project is a priority project for grant funding. A directly negotiated land exchange is consistent with achieving this strategic outcome for the community.
Alternatively if Council considered that the development of the land is best undertaken with an adjoining property then an Expression of Interest process should be followed rather than an open market sale. The Expression of Interest process should seek submissions that demonstrate:
· The intended use of the land
· How existing access arrangements into adjoin properties and between parking areas are to be maintained
· Community benefits
· Consideration being offered
9. Conclusion
No unfulfilled community need in the public interest has been identified warranting the retention of the land for future public purposes.
While the existing parking area is well used it in not operating at full capacity suggesting that additional parking in not yet required. Any future parking demand could be met if the land is developed as a parking area that integrates with Council’s existing car park off Lead Street.
Retention of the site has not been identified in Council’s Regional Community Strategic Plan and associated documents other than Council assets matching community needs.
The land is undeveloped and is surplus to Council requirements at this point in time. Disposal of the site by land exchange with the Club is recommended.
Key Pillar 4. Our Infrastructure
CSP Strategy IN4 - Maintain and update existing community facilities, and support the development of new community infrastructure as needed
Delivery Program Action IN4.1 - Develop and maintain new and existing recreational and community assets to address our communities needs in a sustainable manner
Operational Plan Activity IN4.1.4 - Manage Council’s properties and buildings
ATTACHMENTS: a. Locality Plan ⇩
b. Council Owned Land ⇩
c. Infrastrucure Plan ⇩
d. Proposed Area for Chinamans Creek Public Open Space ⇩
6.2 Yass Soldiers Club
Attachment d Proposed Area for Chinamans Creek Public Open Space
Proposed Area for Land Exchange – Chinamans Creek
6.3 Planning Proposal - 'Coolawin', 208 Sibley Road, Gundaroo
SUMMARY
To advise on the outcome of the request for a Gateway determination for the draft Planning Proposal for part 208 Sibley Road, Gundaroo.
That the Gateway determination for 208 Sibley Road, Gundaroo be noted. |
Financial IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
POlicy & Legislation
· Yass Valley Local Environmental Plan 2013
· South East Tableland Regional Plan 2036
· Yass Valley Settlement Strategy 2036
· Gundaroo Masterplan 2017
REPORT
In June 2020 Council supported a draft Planning Proposal for part of ‘Coolawin’, 208 Sibley Road, Gundaroo to be rezoned from RU1 Primary Production (40 ha) to R5 Large Lot Residential (2ha) and resolved that:
1. Draft Planning Proposal (PP.2016.02) be endorsed and forwarded to the Minister for Planning & Public Spaces to request a Gateway determination pursuant to s3.34 Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 as the proposal:
• Is consistent with the objectives of the Gundaroo and Sutton Master Plans of containing the size and restricting the expansion of the village
• Provides a transition between the village zone and the primary production zone
2. The Gundaroo Masterplan be revised/amended to include the subject land to accommodate rural residential development if the Planning Proposal is approved
3. Staff bring back to Council a report based on the Town & Villages Study 2010 outlining arguments for and against the rezoning of the draft Planning Proposal (PP.2016.02)
On 10 November 2020 the Department of Planning, Industry & Environment advised that the Planning Proposal should not proceed. The reasons are included in Attachment A.
Based on this advice the need to revise/amend the Gundaroo Master Plan and a further report on the Town & Villages Study are no longer required.
There is provision for either Council or the proponent to seek a review of a Gateway Determination. It is not intended that Council seek a review given the site was not originally identified within the Gundaroo Masterplan, however the proponent may choose to pursue a review.
Key Pillar 1. Our Environment
CSP Strategy EN4 - Maintain a balance between growth, development and environmental protection through sensible planning
Delivery Program Action EN4.1 - Ensure Council's statutory planning instruments are up to date and reflective of the community needs
Operational Plan Activity EN4.1.1 – Undertake ongoing strategic land use planning and reviews of existing instruments
ATTACHMENTS: a. Gateway determination ⇩
6.4 Planning Proposal - Kyeema, Gundaroo
SUMMARY
To present a report on the draft Planning Proposal to amend the zone and lot size boundaries as they currently apply to land north of Gundaroo within the Yass Valley LEP 2013, so as to align with the subdivision layout approved by Development Consent DA 185092.
That: 1. Planning Proposal for Kyeema Administrative Amendment (PP.2020.04) be endorsed and forwarded to the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces to request a Gateway determination pursuant to s3.34 Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979. 2. Planning Proposal (PP.2020.04) be adopted if no significant objections are received after the public exhibition of the Planning Proposal pursuant to the conditions of Gateway determination in accordance with s3.34(2)(c) Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979. |
Financial IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
POlicy & Legislation
· Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979
· Yass Valley LEP 2013
REPORT
1. Background
Amendment 2 to the Yass Valley LEP 2013 was gazetted in 2 March 2018, which included the land to north of the Gundaroo Village known as ‘Kyeema’.
An error occurred during the survey and design of the subdivision in the Development Application, where the lot layout did not align with the zone boundaries. This error was not identified and a Development Consent subsequently issued on 21 December 2018.
The draft Planning Proposal seeks to amend the Yass Valley LEP 2013 to adjust the boundaries of the applicable zones to be consistent with Development Consent.
2. Need for Planning Proposal
The discrepancies between the Yass Valley LEP 2013 and the approved Development Consent layout are shown below. These only became apparent following the registration of the plan of subdivision and Council’s receipt of the updated cadastre from NSW Spatial Services.
Stage 1 of Development Consent
(Areas of land where there are discrepancies are highlighted blue and orange)
Stage 2 of Development Consent
(Areas of land where there are discrepancies are highlighted blue and orange)
In summary, the draft Planning Proposal seeks to:
· Amend the Yass Valley LEP 2013 zone boundaries between the R2 Low Density Residential, E3 Environmental Management and E4 Environmental Living zones
· Amend the Lot Size Map in the Yass Valley LEP 2013 to align with the adjusted zone boundaries
· Amend the extent of the land edged blue on the Lot Size Map relating to the provision of reticulated sewerage (i.e. Clause 6.12 Yass Valley LEP 2013)
3. Conclusion
The draft Planning Proposal is substantially administrative in nature, however the proposed amendment will still need to address the usual requirements of consistency with local and regional strategies as well as the physical features of the site including flood affected areas.
It is recommended that the draft Planning Proposal be endorsed and be forwarded to the Minister for Planning & Public Spaces to request a Gateway determination. The Minister’s Delegation to make the amendment as local plan-making authority should also be sought.
Key Pillar 1. Our Environment
CSP Strategy EN4 - Maintain a balance between growth, development and environmental protection through sensible planning
Delivery Program Action EN4.1 - Ensure Council's statutory planning instruments are up to date and reflective of the community needs
Operational Plan Activity EN4.1.1 – Undertake ongoing strategic land use planning and reviews of existing instruments
Ordinary Council Meeting 25 November 2020
6.5 Development Consent No DA200049 - Subdivision, Isabel Drive, MurrumBAteman
SUMMARY
To present a request for a review of determination of Development Consent No DA200049 for the subdivision at Isabel Drive, Murrumbateman. Specifically the request seeks review of conditions relating to conditions imposed for demonstrating electricity and telecommunication supply availability, the voluntary planning agreement (VPA), provision of shared paths, and provision of bus stops.
That: 1. The conditions requiring the Applicant to demonstrate electricity and telecommunications prior to Subdivision Works Certificate be removed as they are not required by Council policy. 2. The conditions relating to the Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) be amended to allow a resolution of Council for the draft VPA to be placed on public exhibition as the acceptable point for when a Subdivision Works Certificate could be issued. 3. The conditions relating to the location of shared paths remains in accordance with the conditions of Development Consent, however the standard of construction for the horse trail be reduced to decomposed granite. 4. The condition relating to bus stops be amended to increase the flexibility for achieving the most suitable outcome. |
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Resources for development assessment are provided for in the current Operational Plan.
POLICY & LEGISLATION
· Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979
· Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000
· Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016
· Water Management Act 2000
· National Parks & Wildlife Act 1974
· State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007
· Yass Valley Local Environmental Plan 2013
· Yass Valley Settlement Strategy
· Murrumbateman Structure Plan
· South East & Tablelands Regional Plan 2036
· Yass Valley Community Engagement Strategy
· Yass Valley Development Contributions Plan 2018
· Road Standards Policy
· Building Line Policy
· Application Assessment & Decision Making Policy
· Water Supply for Rural Areas & Villages Policy
· Provision of Electricity Supply & Telecommunications Service for Subdivisions Policy
· Parks & Playgrounds Strategy
REPORT
1. Application Details
Date Review Received |
- |
2 November 2020 |
Land |
- |
Lot 1 DP 125138, Isabel Drive, Murrumbateman |
Area |
- |
99.55ha |
Zoning |
- |
R2 Low Density Residential and R5 Large Lot Residential |
2. Site Description and Locality
The development site is approximately 100ha in size and located west-southwest of the Murrumbateman village. It is an irregular shape, with frontage to Isabel Drive, McIntosh Circuit, Colonial Place and Merryville Drive. The site is bordered by Shaw Winery, Merryville Estate and Carrington Park Estate and was formerly part of the Shaw Vineyard Estate but has been excised from that holding.
The site is generally undulating with the highest areas being towards the centre. McClungs Creek bisects the site and there are several other drainage lines and dams. Part of the site is identified as having significant native vegetation. There is currently no significant development located on the land other than bores and historically has been used primarily for stock grazing.
The site is subject to two zones and minimum lot sizes under the Yass Valley LEP 2013. The eastern portion is zoned R2 Low Density Residential with a minimum lot size of 6,500m2 and the western portion is zoned R5 Large Lot Residential with a minimum lot size of 1ha.
A Locality Plan is included in Attachment A.
3. Background and Proposal
The approved development is a 101 lot subdivision, including 100 residential lots and one public open space lot (refer Attachment B). The subdivision is approved in two stages with stage one being the eastern portion and stage two the western portion. The lot sizes range from 5,800m2 to 14,800m2.
The public open space lot includes a shared horse/bike/pedestrian trail from Isabel Drive to Merryville Drive. The open space lot is to be dedicated to Council subject to a Voluntary Planning Agreement covering the dedication, associated works and an initial maintenance period.
The Applicant has now lodged a request for review of determination of Development Consent (refer Attachment C). Specifically the request seeks review of conditions for electricity and telecommunication supply availability, the Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA), provision of shared paths and bus stops.
4. Public Exhibition
Public exhibition of the request review was sent to all persons who previously made a submission – previously 65 submissions were received which have previously been distributed to Councillors. Two additional submissions have been received in relation to the review request (refer Attachment D) at the time of compiling this report.
5. Assessment
A review of the original assessment and determination has been undertaken in accordance with the planning legislation. The following is an assessment and response to the matters that are subject of the review request.
5.1 Electricity and Telecommunications
Consent conditions require evidence to be submitted indicating suitable arrangements for electricity and telecommunications can be made available to service the proposed development, including with consideration of impact on existing capacity, reliability, and the opportunity for feed in for electricity. This evidence must be submitted before any subdivision works can occur. Conditions also require the Applicant to provide evidence the required work has been completed prior to the issue of any Subdivision Certificate (i.e. the final step which then allows titles to be created for the new lots).
The Applicant has requested that the requirement to submit evidence prior to the issue of any Subdivision Works Certificate be deleted as the timing for the Essential Energy and NBN Co. design processes will prevent them from commencing works at the site.
Concern has been raised in the submissions received about the adequacy of electricity and internet supply within Murrumbateman and the potential impact that the additional development will have on those services. Particular concern was in relation to reliability and solar feed-in for electricity, and speed for internet.
Council’s Provision of Electricity Supply & Telecommunications Service for Subdivisions Policy determines the requirements for ensuring the satisfactory provision of these services in subdivisions. It stipulates that an Applicant only has to provide the notice of arrangements prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate. There is no requirement within the policy for an Applicant to provide any such evidence of servicing capability arrangements prior to the issue of the earlier Subdivision Works Certificate.
It is ultimately the responsibility of Essential Energy and the telecommunications service provider to ensure that the design of the service infrastructure is adequate and does not adversely impact existing users.
Upon review it has therefore been concluded that this requirement is unnecessary and not in accordance with the policy, and as such can be deleted.
5.2 Voluntary Planning Agreement
A Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) is proposed by the Applicant for the open space and to cover the dedication, works, and initial maintenance period. This offer was supported by Council with a further report to be presented with draft terms at a later date.
The Development Consent conditions require the VPA to be entered into with Council prior to the issue of a Subdivision Works Certificate. The Applicant has identified a concern that a VPA is not considered to be ‘entered into’ until such time as the full process has been completed, including public exhibition, any amendments and execution. In turn the Applicant has identified that this will delay their ability to obtain any Subdivision Works Certificate to commence earthworks. This is accepted and it is suggested the condition be modified for the VPA to be submitted prior to the Subdivision Works Certificate and the VPA finalised prior to the issue of a Subdivision Certificate.
5.3 Paths and Cycleways
Submissions received highlighted an importance of pedestrian, horse and bike connections for recreational and alternative transport purposes.
The Applicant has proposed a pedestrian/horse/bike trail from Isabel Drive through the open space lot to Merryville Drive. Although there had been requests within submissions for paths and cycleway to be included on all roads, this was noted as unrealistic and unnecessary, with conditions instead requiring a 2.5m wide shared path on Roads #1, #2 and #4 on the eastern side of the open space lot (refer Attachment E). This condition had been on the basis of:
· In response to the public submissions received
· In response to the Transport for NSW submission encouraging opportunity for alternative modes of transport
· To provide permeability through the subdivision
· Consistency with the Jiparu subdivision which has a shared path the length of Jiparu Drive
· Consistency with Carrington Park which has path running from Merryville Drive to Marquess Place
The Applicant accepts the construction of a shared path from McIntosh Circuit to the open space lot primarily along Road #1. The Applicant has however requested that the requirement for a shared path on Road #2 and the full extent of Road #4 are unnecessary and duplicate the horse trail that is already being provided as a the north and south connection. These paths add $115,000 to the cost of the project with limited benefit. The Applicant has suggested a reduced amount of shared paths in the subdivision (refer Attachment F)
If the path along Road #2 is to be required the Applicant has suggested that the horse trail be constructed with a decomposed granite surface rather than the asphalt construction originally envisaged.
Council does not have a policy position or development control in relation to the provision of paths and cycleways for large lot subdivisions.
The potential implication with shared paths on all roads is that the subdivision may present as a more urban form which could detract from the preferred character of the locality.
There are generally two potential options that may be appropriate:
Option 1: The location of shared paths remains as per the current conditions, but a reduction in the standard of construction for the horse trail from asphalt to crushed granite be supported.
Option 2: The location of the shared paths are reduced as requested by the Applicant, but this should only be done so with an additional requirement for a link between the new path on Road #1 and the existing path in Carrington Park Estate which currently terminates at Marquess Place. This would be a less preferred outcome, but would still provide a reasonable degree of permeability and connectivity through part of the subdivision and with Carrington Park.
The paths required by the current condition in Option 1 is considered to be the preferred option as it provides the greatest level of connectivity, permeability, and protection for vulnerable roads users. Under Option 1 Council could also consider the construction of the additional link into the existing path in Carrington Park at a later date.
Option 2 would still be acceptable as a minimum, although it provides less connectivity for the lots through the middle and south of the subdivision. The location of bus stops would have increased importance where the number of paths have been reduced.
5.4 Bus Stops
The Consent conditions require bus stops to be provided within the subdivision at appropriate intervals in accordance with relevant guidelines. The location to be shown on plans submitted as part of the Subdivision Works Certificate.
The location of bus stops needs to be flexible depending on the needs of the population. It is recommended that the Applicant undertake consultation with local residents, bus service providers and Council on the best locations for bus stops. The Consent conditions can be amended to provide greater flexibility for achieving a suitable outcome with the locations being finalised prior to the issue of a Subdivision Works Certificate.
6. Conclusion
From consideration of the review request and all submissions received, it is concluded that:
· The conditions requiring the Applicant to demonstrate electricity and telecommunications prior to Subdivision Works Certificate be removed as they are not required by Council policy.
· The conditions relating to the VPA be amended to allow a resolution of Council for the draft VPA to be placed on public exhibition as the acceptable point for when a Subdivision Works Certificate could be issued.
· The conditions relating to the location of shared paths remains in accordance with the conditions of Development Consent, however the standard of construction for the horse trail be reduced from asphalt to decomposed granite.
· The condition relating to bus stops be amended to increase the flexibility for achieving the most suitable outcome.
Amended draft conditions are included as Attachment G.
Key Pillar 1. Our Environment
CSP Strategy EN1 - Protect and enhance the existing natural environment, including flora and fauna native to the region
Delivery Program Action EN1.1 - Protect our natural assets in line with community values
Operational Plan Activity EN1.1.1 – Ensure assessment of development applications protects our natural environment
ATTACHMENTS: a. Locality Plan ⇩
b. Approved Subdivision Plan ⇩
c. Review Request ⇩
d. Submissions ⇩
e. Approved Paths ⇩
f. Proposed Paths ⇩
g. Draft Conditions ⇩
6.5 Development Consent No DA200049 - Subdivision, Isabel Drive, Murrumbateman
Attachment a Locality Plan
6.5 Development Consent No DA200049 - Subdivision, Isabel Drive, Murrumbateman
Attachment b Approved Subdivision Plan
6.5 Development Consent No DA200049 - Subdivision, Isabel Drive, Murrumbateman
Attachment c Review Request
Attachment d Submissions
Attachment e Approved Paths
6.5 Development Consent No DA200049 - Subdivision, Isabel Drive, Murrumbateman
Attachment f Proposed Paths
6.5 Development Consent No DA200049 - Subdivision, Isabel Drive, Murrumbateman
Attachment g Draft Conditions
DA200049B - Draft Amended Conditions – Isabel Drive
Proposed amendments to the conditions of Development Consent DA200049 are shown in RED.
PART A - GENERAL CONDITIONS (ALL STAGES)
(1) Consent is granted generally in accordance with the plans and details submitted to Council with the Development Application. The plans of subdivision has been stamped and attached to this consent. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the stamped plan or as modified by these conditions.
(2) This approval relates only to the development referred to in the development application and specifically does not amount to an approval or acceptance by the Council of any works or buildings already erected on the land, whether or not those works or buildings are the subject of a prior development or building approval.
(3) A Subdivision Works Certificate, as defined by the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, shall be obtained for all engineering works prior to any works commencing on site. Council’s fee for providing a Construction Certificate is levied in accordance with Council’s Management Plan relevant at the time of payment.
(4) All engineering design and construction work shall be undertaken in accordance with the following, current at the time of the Engineering Construction Certificate being issued:
· Council's Road Standards Policy RD-POL-09
· Specific Requirements of Transport for NSW
· Council’s Design and Construction Specification – AUS-SPEC #1
· Australian Standards and
· AustRoads
(5) The developer at no cost to Council or Transport for NSW, shall make any necessary alteration, relocation or enlargement to public utilities whether caused directly or indirectly by this proposed subdivision.
(6) Public access to the site and construction works, materials and equipment on the site is to be restricted, when construction work is not in progress or the site is unoccupied.
(7) The capacity and effectiveness of runoff and erosion control measures shall be maintained at all times to the satisfaction of Council as shall any techniques to suppress dust and the tracking of sediment onto existing sealed roads;
(8) The applicant must adhere to the following days and hours of operation for subdivision works associated with the development unless otherwise approved by Council in writing:
· 7.00 am to 6.00 pm Monday to Friday
· 8.00 am to 1.00 pm Saturday
· No work on Sundays or Public Holidays
(9) Noise, dust and odour generated as a result of the development must comply with the provisions of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997.
PART B - PRIOR TO ISSUE OF SUBDIVISION WORKS CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE (ALL STAGES)
(1) The
applicant shall submit evidence that suitable arrangements for electricity
supply can be made available to service the proposed development, including
with consideration of impact on existing capacity and reliability, and the
opportunity for feed-in from new lots.
Deleted.
(2) The
applicant shall submit evidence that suitable arrangements for
telecommunications service (fixed-line NBN fibre) can be made available to
service the proposed development, including with consideration of impact on
existing capacity and reliability. Deleted.
(3) Prior
to the issue of any Subdivision Works Certificate for Stage 1 the Applicant
shall enter into a Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) with Council. The VPA
shall outline the terms of the offer made by the Applicant and accepted by
Council in connection with the subject Development Application. The terms of
the offer shall generally include:
(a) A
Landscape Plan, Vegetation Management Plan and Riparian Restoration Plan and
detail the work to be undertaken in as part of the open space embellishment and
rehabilitation.
(b) Facilities
to be provided within the open space are to be consistent with a Category 3
Park in accordance with Council’s Park & Playground Strategy 2017.
(c) That
all work shall be completed to the satisfaction of Council prior to the issue
of the Subdivision Certificate for the proposed Open Space lot.
(d) Prior
to the issue of any Subdivision Works Certificate the Applicant must register
the VPA on the title of the land to which the VPA applies.
(e) The
maintenance responsibility period for the Applicant shall be five (5) years
from the date of the issue of a Subdivision Certificate.
(f) A
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in relation to the provision of easements and
ongoing access and responsibilities for the private non-potable bore water
supply infrastructure proposed to be located and cross the open space lot
dedicated to Council.
Prior to the issue of any Subdivision Works Certificate for Stage 1 the Applicant shall submit a draft Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) to Council for consideration.
The VPA shall outline the terms of the offer made by the Applicant and accepted by Council in connection with the subject Development Application. The terms of the offer shall generally include:
(a) A Landscape Plan, Vegetation Management Plan and Riparian Restoration Plan and detail the work to be undertaken in as part of the open space embellishment and rehabilitation.
(b) Facilities to be provided within the open space are to be consistent with a Category 3 Park in accordance with Council’s Park & Playground Strategy 2017.
(c) That all work shall be completed to the satisfaction of Council prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate for the proposed Open Space lot.
(d) Prior
to the issue of any Subdivision Works Certificate the Applicant must register
the VPA on the title of the land to which the VPA applies.
Prior to the issue of Subdivision Certificate the Applicant must register the VPA on the title of the land to which the VPA applies.
(e) The maintenance responsibility period for the Applicant shall be five (5) years from the date of the issue of a Subdivision Certificate.
(f) A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in relation to the provision of easements and ongoing access and responsibilities for the private non-potable bore water supply infrastructure proposed to be located and cross the open space lot dedicated to Council.
(4) A Construction Environmental Management Plan to address construction activity is to be prepared and submitted to Council. The Construction Environmental Management plan shall include:
· Details for waste management
· Details for minimising impacts on neighbouring properties
· Details for minimising impacts on the road network
· The discouragement of construction traffic through Carrington Park estate
· The Biodiversity Management Plan
· The dam dewatering plan.
(5) The class and number of ecosystem credits in Table 1 must be retired to offset the residual biodiversity impacts of the development.
The requirement to retire credits may be satisfied by payment to the Biodiversity Conservation Fund of an amount equivalent to the class and number of ecosystem credits, as calculated by the Biodiversity Offsets Payment Calculator.
Note: Prices of credits in the Biodiversity Offsets Payment Calculator are subject to change. The amount payable to discharge an offset obligation will be determined at the time of payment.
Table 1 Ecosystem credits required to be retired – like for like
Impacted plant community type |
Number of ecosystem credits |
IBRA sub-region |
Plant community type(s) that can be used to offset impacts from the development |
PCT 1330 – Yellow Box Blakelys Red Gum grassy woodland on the tablelands, South Eastern Highlands Bioregion
|
12 |
Murrumbateman, Bondo, Crookwell, Inland Slopes, Monaro, Murrumbateman and Snowy Mountains.
Or
Any IBRA subregion that is within 100 kilometres of the outer edge of the impacted site.
|
White Box Yellow Box Blakelys Red Gum Woodland.
|
Evidence of the retirement of credits or payment to the Biodiversity Conservation Fund in satisfaction of Table 1 requirements must be provided to Council prior to issue of a Subdivision Works Certificate.
Evidence must be provided in accordance with the following:
(a) Retirement of credits: A credit retirement report issued by OEH confirming credit transactions.
(b) Payment to the Biodiversity Conservation Fund: A section 6.33 Statement Confirming Payment into the Biodiversity Conservation Fund issued by the Biodiversity Conservation Trust.
(6) The class and number of species credits in Table 2 must be retired to offset the residual biodiversity impacts of the development.
The requirement to retire credits may be satisfied by payment to the Biodiversity Conservation Fund of an amount equivalent to the class and number of species credits, as calculated by the Biodiversity Offsets Payment Calculator.
Note: Prices of credits in the Biodiversity Offsets Payment Calculator are subject to change. The amount payable to discharge an offset obligation will be determined at the time of payment.
Table 2 Species credits required to be retired – like for like
Impacted species credit species |
Number of species credits |
IBRA sub-region |
Polytelis swainsonii / Superb Parrot |
1 |
Murrumbateman, Bondo, Crookwell, Inland Slopes, Monaro, Murrumbateman and Snowy Mountains.
Or
Any IBRA subregion that is within 100 kilometres of the outer edge of the impacted site. |
Evidence of the retirement of credits or payment to the Biodiversity Conservation Fund in satisfaction of Table 2 requirements must be provided to Council prior to the issue of a Subdivision Works Certificate.
Evidence must be provided in accordance with the following:
(a) Retirement of credits: A credit retirement report issued by OEH confirming credit transactions.
(b) Payment to the Biodiversity Conservation Fund: A section 6.33 Statement Confirming Payment into the Biodiversity Conservation Fund issued by the Biodiversity Conservation Trust.
(7) A Biodiversity Management Plan must be submitted to and approved by Council. The Biodiversity Management Plan may form part of a Construction Environmental Management Plan.
The Biodiversity Management Plan must:
· Identify the development site as per the Biodiversity Development Assessment Report (BDAR) and approved plans
· Identify areas of land that are to be retained as outlined in the Biodiversity Development Assessment Report
· Include a Statement of Commitments which identifies all measures proposed in the Biodiversity Development Assessment Report to mitigate and manage impacts on biodiversity. The statement must indicate what the measure is, when and how often it is to be applied and who is responsible for undertaking the measure.
· State that construction impacts will be restricted to the development site and must not encroach into areas of retained native vegetation and habitat. All materials stockpiles, vehicle parking, machinery storage and other temporary facilities must be located within the areas for which biodiversity impacts were assessed in the Biodiversity Development Assessment Report.
(8) Engineering drawings for the provision of access to each lot shall be submitted to Council’s Engineering Department for approval in accordance with:
· Council’s Roads Standards Policy RD-POL-09 and
· Council’s Design and Construction Specification – AUS-SPEC #1.
(9) Engineering drawings for the construction of all roads shall be submitted to Council’s Engineering Department for approval in accordance with:
· Council’s Roads Standards Policy RD-POL-09 and
· Council’s Design and Construction Specification – AUS-SPEC #1.
Note: All roads must be constructed in accordance with Local or Cul-De-Sac standards as specified for Yass and Murrumbateman Township Roads within the Council’s Road Standards Policy.
Note: Roadside drainage shall be constructed along the frontage of the subject land adjacent to all roads. Where kerb & and gutter or flush kerb (if approved by the Director of Infrastructure & Assets) standards are to be in accordance with Council’s Roads Policy RD-POL-09.
(10) The Engineering Drawings for the construction of roads shall provide for the provision of larger vehicles such as public transport service and construction vehicles (e.g. garbage trucks, delivery trucks).
(11) All cul-de-sacs shall have a 12m turning radius and provided with an asphaltic concrete wearing surface. Minimum standard 40mm thick AC14. In accordance with Council’s Road Standards Policy RD-POL-9. The road reserve will need to be increased at cul-de-sac ends to cater for the turning radius and road verge.
(12) The Engineering Drawings for the construction of roads shall provide for alternative means of travel to the motor vehicle. Facilities are required to be extended to and provided through the subdivision for the safe and effective movement of pedestrians and cyclists to nearby facilities:
(a) A shared
pathway 2.5m wide, 100mm thick, reinforced concrete or asphalt on 50mm
compacted road base shall be provided on new roads #1, #2 and #4 on the eastern
portion of the development (east of the open space lot and horse trail path).
(b) A horse
trail path is to be provided from Isabel Drive to Merryville Drive as shown on
the approved plan of subdivision. Details are to be provided on the engineering
drawings.
OPTION 1
(a) A shared pathway 2.5m wide, 100mm thick, reinforced concrete or asphalt on 50mm compacted road base shall be provided on new roads #1, #2 and #4 on the eastern portion of the development (east of the open space lot and horse trail path).
(b) A horse trail path is to be provided from Isabel Drive to Merryville Drive as shown on the approved plan of subdivision. Details are to be provided on the engineering drawings. The horse trail path is to be minimum 2.5m wide, 50mm decomposed granite on minimum 50mm compacted road base.
OR OPTION 2:
(a) A shared pathway 2.5m wide, 100mm thick, reinforced concrete or asphalt on 50mm compacted road base shall be provided from McIntosh Circuit along road #4 (to the intersection with road #1) and along road #1 on the eastern portion of the development (east of the open space lot and horse trail path). A connection shall also be provided along road #6 to the existing path on Colonial Place in Carrington Park Estate.
(b) A horse trail path is to be provided from Isabel Drive to Merryville Drive as shown on the approved plan of subdivision. Details are to be provided on the engineering drawings. The horse trail path is to be minimum 2.5m wide, 100mm thick, reinforced concrete or asphalt on 50mm compacted road base.
(13) Engineering drawings associated with the design of creek crossings and waterways are to be provided to Council for approval. The design shall be undertaken by a suitable qualified engineer and designed in accordance with Council policies, Council’s Design and Construction Specification –AusSpec#1, and relevant standards.
As part of the design, calculations of the catchment, flow velocities and volumes will need to be submitted to Council as well as a suitable proposal for upstream and downstream erosion protection. Details of road approaches to the crossing are to be supplied as part of these drawings.
(14) Bus
stop facilities are to be provided within the estate at appropriate intervals
for the convenience of the user in accordance with relevant guidelines.
Bus shelters are to be of a construction consistent with shelters recently
installed by Council. Show bus stop locations on the drawings.
Bus stop facilities are to be provided in consultation with Council and local bus service providers within the development and/or surrounding roads. Bus shelters are to be of a construction consistent with shelters recently installed by Council. Show bus stop locations on the drawings.
(15) Engineering drawings associated with the drainage of stormwater shall be submitted to Council’s Engineering Department for approval in accordance with Council’s Stormwater Policies and Design and Construction Specification – Ausspec#1.
(16) Engineering drawings must include details of the discharge of stormwater off the site (including quantities for various storm event and is to include stormwater that falls on the site or enters the site from upstream), what is proposed to manage the discharge (including details of any infrastructure etc.), the potential downstream effects of such discharges and actions proposed to ameliorate such effects and what is proposed to ameliorate any effects on the site from stormwater from upstream of the site.
(17) An overland flow path to accommodate the discharge from a 1 in 100 year storm event shall be provided, including the provision of an easement where this flow path traverses private property. Details of any stormwater retention or water quality basins are to be provided.
(18) A Design Certification Report relating to the detailed engineering design work shall be submitted to Council as per Council’s Design Specification - AusSpec #1, Annexure DQS-A.
Note: This Design Report shall provide evidence that suitably qualified designers have designed each component of the engineering works for the development.
(19) A list of three street names, for each new street shall be submitted to Council for consideration and approval in accordance with Council’s Naming of Roads Policy RD-POL-6.
PART C - PRIOR TO ISSUE OF SUBDIVISION WORKS CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE (STAGE 1 ONLY)
(1) Engineering drawings for the design and construction of a roundabout at the intersection of the new subdivision road and McIntosh Circuit are to be submitted to Council’s Infrastructure & Assets Division. As a minimum, the pavement of the roundabout is to be asphaltic concrete.
Note: The centre of the roundabout shall be concrete or asphalt.
(2) The Engineering Drawings for the construction of roads shall provide for the provision of alternative access in the initial stage should an incident occurs at or near the proposed intersection to Isabel Drive for accessibility for households and emergency purposes.
PART D - PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION WORKS COMMENCING (ALL STAGES)
(1) Subdivision work shall not be commenced until the person having the benefit of this Development Consent provides at least two days’ notice to Council of their intention to commence subdivision work.
(2) Any contractor undertaking works in an existing Council road reserve shall also submit the following details:
· A current public liability certificate with a minimum cover of $20 million
· Current Plant / vehicle insurances
· A certified traffic control plan for the proposed works
(3) A Soil and Water Management Plan shall be submitted to Council’s Infrastr4ucture & Assets Division for approval in accordance with Council’s Design and Construction Specification – Ausspec#1. The plan shall include construction techniques to minimise site disturbance and the potential for soil erosion by wind or water, erosion control on any watercourse on the property, revegetation of disturbed areas and any other matters that are deemed necessary by Council.
Note: An indicative plan may be prepared to complement the design plans, however, the final plan for approval shall be prepared in consultation with the construction contractor;
(4) Prior to works commencing, Council is to be provided with all appropriate approvals to construct the creek crossings. Approvals may include Fisheries Permit, Controlled Activity Permit from Natural Resources Access Regulator, etc.
(5) A sign must be displayed in a prominent position on the site while subdivision work is being undertaken.
The sign must list the following details:
· The name, address and telephone number of the Principal Certifying Authority
· The name or the Principal Contractor and an after-hours telephone number and
· That unauthorised entry to the site is prohibited.
The sign must be maintained while the subdivision work is being carried out and removed upon completion.
(6) Toilet facilities must be provided at the work site. Each toilet provided must be:
(a) a flushing portable toilet maintained under a service agreement with an accredited service provider; or
(b) a standard flushing toilet connected to a public sewer; or
(c) a standard flushing toilet connected to an accredited on-site sewage management facility approved by Council.
PART E – NATURAL RESOURCES ACCESS REGULATOR (NRAR GENERAL TERMS OF APPROVAL) (ALL STAGES)
(1) The development must be undertaken in accordance with the General Terms of Approval issued by the Natural Resources Access Regulator (NRAR) under the Water Management Act 2000 dated 10 September 2020 and attached as Appendix A.
PART F - TREE REMOVAL AND MANAGEMENT (ALL STAGES)
(1) All trees that are proposed to be retained must be protected prior to any site works or civil works commencing on the site in accordance with AS 4970-2009 - Protection of Trees on Development Sites.
(2) The removal of trees from the site is restricted to those in accordance with the plans and details submitted to Council with the Development Application, stamped and attached to this consent.
(3) The applicant shall nominate a suitably qualified and experienced person who will be responsible for overseeing the tree removal and tree management.
(4) Public access to the site is to be restricted when tree removal work is in progress or the site is unoccupied. All public safety provisions must be in place prior to the commencement of any works and must be maintained throughout tree removal work.
(5) A suitably qualified and/or experienced tree arborist is required to carry out all tree removal.
(6) All tree pruning must be undertaken in accordance with AS 4373-2007 and by a suitably qualified and/or experienced tree arborist.
(7) The one (1) hollow bearing paddock tree to be removed (living or dead) will need to be inspected by an ecologist for nesting wildlife present in the hollows prior to removal and any wildlife relocated by a fauna spotter catcher.
PART G – DAM DEWATERING (ALL STAGES)
(1) A dam dewatering plan prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced person shall be submitted to Council and shall be implemented for any dams to be filled. Long neck turtles are present in some of the farms dams that are proposed to be drained. These turtles are protected fauna and will need to be captured and relocated when the dams are dewatered prior to being filled. An ecologist will be required to be present to capture and relocate turtles or other native fauna within the dams during the dam dewatering process.
PART H – ABORIGINAL SITES AND OBJECTS (ALL STAGES)
(1) All impacts to identified Aboriginal sites and objects should be avoided. If this not possible then an Aboriginal Heritage Impact Permit (AHIP) is required.
(2) The identified Aboriginal site and objects are to be fenced during all ground distributing works including during revegetation works. The fences are to be put in place by a qualified archaeologist and members of the Onerwal LALC.
(3) Should any additional Aboriginal sites, objects or suspected human remains be unearthed during works associated with the subdivision, all work must cease and the NSW Government Environment Line (131 555) is to be contacted immediately. No works is to recommence at the location unless authorised by Heritage NSW in writing.
(4) Should any additional potential archaeological relics are discovered during works associated with the subdivision, all work must cease and NSW Government Environment Line (131 555) is to be contacted immediately. No works is to recommence at the location unless authorised by Heritage NSW in writing.
(5) If impacts to Aboriginal heritage sites or objects are found to be a possibility from the proposed development then consultation should be undertaken to discuss management and mitigation options in accordance with the “Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Consultation Requirements for Proponents”.
(6) All Aboriginal objects and places are protected in NSW under National Parks & Wildlife Act 1974. It is an offence to harm an Aboriginal object or place without an approval issued by the Heritage NSW.
PART I – INSPECTIONS (ALL STAGES)
To arrange an inspection with Council please use the on-line booking system:
yassvalley.nsw.gov.au > Our Services > Planning and Building > Certification and Inspections > Inspections
If Council undertakes the inspection, the fee per inspection will be levied in accordance with Council’s Fees and Charges, relevant at the time of payment.
(1) A compliance certificate must be obtained from Council’s Infrastructure & Assets Division at the following stages of construction:
Roads
(a) Completion of sub-grade pavement layer (proof roll);
(b) Completion of stormwater drainage lines – prior to backfilling;
(c) Completion of stormwater detention infrastructure;
(d) Completion of stormwater quality improvement infrastructure;
(e) Completion of base course pavement layer (proof roll);
(f) Completion of kerb and guttering;
(g) Completion of round-a-bout subgrade;
(h) Completion of round-a bout pavement;
(i) Completion of two-coat bitumen seal;
(j) Completion of property access. This inspection is for access dimensions and to ensure there are no ‘trip-fall’ hazards. Compliance with change in longitudinal grade will only be undertaken where it can be confirmed via WAE drawings;
(k) Completion of shared pathway;
(l) Completion of horse trail;
Other
(m) Completion of streetscape works and other public landscaping;
(n) Completion of boundary fencing of each lot created;
(o) Practical completion;
(p) Final inspection.
(q) Refund of bond.
PART J - PRIOR TO ISSUE OF SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE (STAGE 1 ONLY)
(1) The terms of the Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) associated with the open space (Lot 202) must be satisfied.
(2) Construction of a the roundabout at the intersection of the new subdivision road and McIntosh Circuit is to be completed in accordance with the designs/drawings approved with the Subdivision Works Certificate.
(3) Prior to the issue of Subdivision Certificate the Applicant must register the VPA on the title of the land to which the VPA applies.
PART K - PRIOR TO ISSUE OF SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE (ALL STAGES)
(1) In accordance with section 7.12 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Yass Valley Development Contributions Plan 2018, a monetary contribution must be paid to Council if the proposed cost of carrying out the development exceeds $100,000.
The contribution rate is determined in accordance with the table below:
Proposed cost of carrying out the development |
Contribution Rate |
Up to and including $100,000 |
Nil |
More than $100,000 and up to and including $200,000 |
0.5% of that cost |
More than $200,000 |
1% of that cost |
Note: The cost of carrying out development is cumulative across stages.
(2) A levy under the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986, equivalent to 0.35% of the value of the works, shall be paid to Council, where the value of such works is greater than $25,000.00;
(3) Roads and associated infrastructure is constructed/upgraded in accordance with either Council’s Road Standards Policy RD-POL-09 or, where required, designs/drawings approved with the Subdivision Works Certificate.
(4) The property vehicular accesses from the road to the property boundary must be constructed in accordance with Council’s Road Standards Policy RD-POL-09 or, where required, designs/drawings approved with the Subdivision Works Certificate.
(5) Street name signs shall be installed at the entrance to each new road. The street sign shall be in accordance with Council’s standard urban street sign design. Where the road is no-through a “no-through road” sign is to be installed
(6) Stock proof fencing must be provided to all boundaries of the proposed lots in accordance with Council’s Non-Urban Fencing Policy DA-POL-12.
The minimum acceptable standard for new fencing work for rural residential lots is as follows:
· A fence height of no less than 1200 mm.
· Strainers – spacing 100 metres to 200 metres depending on terrain.
· Steel Star Pickets at 4 metre centres.
· Two 1.57 mm high tensile plain wires on top.
· Three 2.8 mm high tensile carry wires.
· “Wire Netting” - must be set no higher than 50 mm above the surface of the ground.
· Netting floodgates as required.
· All gates must be set back a minimum of 15 metres from the edge of road formation
The existing boundary fence where dilapidated, must be repaired to the above standard.
Existing fence in good order but of varying standards may be permitted if such standard is deemed by Council as ‘stock proof’.
Where the boundary fence does not coincide with the property boundary for proposed subdivision, the applicant must provide a note on the linen plan that fence may not be constructed on the boundary of particular lot.
(7) In accordance with the Provision of Electricity Supply and Telecommunications Service for Subdivisions Policy DA-POL-17, evidence must be submitted to Council demonstrating that a satisfactory standard of electricity supply is available to each lot within the subdivision.
(8) In accordance with the Provision of Electricity Supply and Telecommunications Service for Subdivisions Policy DA-POL-17, evidence must be submitted to Council demonstrating that a satisfactory standard of telecommunications service is available to each lot within the subdivision.
(9) The applicant must confirm by survey that the formation and associated batters and drainage structures of McIntosh Circuit and Isabel along the frontage of the subject property, are within the road reserve.
Where the existing road is within the subject land, the applicant must ensure that the legal and physical attributes coincide by adjustment of the road reserve. The Applicant’s request for a Subdivision Certificate must include specific reference to the review and whether or not adjustment of the road reserve is necessary.
(10) Easements must be created on the final plan of subdivision centred on any existing or new power lines/cables passing through private property and must be in accordance with the service provider’s requirements.
(11) Building envelopes must be designated on the final plan of subdivision over each proposed lot in accordance with the approved plan of subdivision.
The accompanying Section 88E instrument must state that no permanent or temporary dwellings and/or outbuildings and associated infrastructure are permitted to be erected outside of the identified building envelope shown on the plan of subdivision.
The name of the Authority having the power to release, vary or modify this restriction must be Yass Valley Council.
(12) A restriction to user under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919 must be placed on all lots (excluding Lot 202) created requiring potable water storage (rainwater tanks) to the following minimum standard:
Ø 45,000 litres for houses less than 150 m2
Ø 120,000 litres for houses in excess of 150 m2.
Above ground tanks shall provide for the refilling of fire tankers by the installation of a “Storz” fitting at the base of the tank with a gate valve. The house service may branch off this outlet. Underground tanks shall include an access hole at least 150mm diameter;
The name of the Authority having the power to release, vary or modify this restriction must be Yass Valley Council.
(13) A restriction to user under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919 must be placed on all lots created prohibiting the use of the following onsite effluent disposal systems:
(a) Primary treatment septic tank and absorption trench.
(b) Subsoil irrigation beds for effluent dispersal of wet composting closet treatment systems (e.g. worm farms).
The name of the Authority having the power to release, vary or modify this restriction must be Yass Valley Council.
(14) A restriction to user under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919 requiring the installation of only advanced wastewater treatment systems with nutrient reduction linked to subsurface irrigation must be placed on the following lots (inclusive):
Lots 101-102, 107-113, 124-131, 133-137, 142, 146-147, 173-184 and 196-201.
The name of the Authority having the power to release, vary or modify this restriction must be Yass Valley Council.
(15) A restriction to user must be created under section 88 of the Conveyancing Act 1919 over all proposed lots stating:
An on-site effluent disposal system must not be installed without the consideration of the “Land Capability Assessment” prepared by John Franklin of Franklin Consulting (Version 2 – 29 September 2020), submitted in support of the subdivision.
The name of the Authority having the power to release, vary or modify this restriction must be Yass Valley Council.
(16) A restriction to user under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919 must be placed on all lots created (excluding Lot 202) prohibiting the removal of trees and vegetation unless otherwise approved by Yass Valley Council.
The name of the Authority having the power to release, vary or modify this restriction must be Yass Valley Council.
(17) The Applicant is to provide evidence from WaterNSW that the existing Water Supply Works approval and Water Access Licence (WAL) has been amended and approved, including:
· The change in purpose of the current approval to reflect the current and future proposed use; and
· Correctly identifying the land the approval is to supply.
Note: A copy of the letter from WaterNSW is attached for your consideration.
(18) A Communal Water Management Statement (CWMS), prepared in association with the proposed ‘tenancy in common’ arrangements for the supply of non-potable water to each allotment, shall be submitted to Council. The CWMS shall form part of a restrictive covenant under section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, to which each joint tenant is a beneficiary. The CWMS shall:
· Limit the total annual use of non-potable water from the reticulated community supply scheme to that which may be licenced by WaterNSW.
· Prescribe the arrangements on-going management and maintenance of all communal areas and community infrastructure including the non-potable water supply system.
· Provide for the equitable distribution of water including metering of non-potable water supply to each allotment.
· Provide for the ability to introduce water supply restrictions during extended dry periods.
(19) A non-potable water service main (connection) shall be installed from the communal bore to a point inside the front boundary of each allotment created within the subdivision.
(20) The proposed reticulated non-potable bore and the existing bore GW 401758 shall be sealed and bunded (earthen mound or similar) immediately upslope of the bore to prevent access of overland stormwater flow to the bore.
(21) The existing diesel bore pump located on Lot 199 shall be upgraded to an electric pump.
(22) One complete set of “Work as Executed” (WAE) drawings, indicating all details of new engineering works constructed, shall be submitted to Council.
The WAE Drawings shall be supplied to Council in the following format:
· AutoCAD LT 2011 on MGA 94 Zone 55 coordinates; and
· AutoCAD R12/LT2 DXF; and
· PDF; and
· A1 Hard Copy; and
Shall include separate details of for the following:
(a) Stormwater (including detention structures) - Location, Depth, Size, Material, Easement, Invert Level, Grades, Pit Details and tie details;
(b) Transport Infrastructure – roads plan, cross sections, long sections, pavement details, K&G details, Footpath and Cycleway Details, Bus Stop Details, Street Light Locations;
(c) Details of property accesses including a cross section from the centre of the road to at least 3 metres into the adjacent property. Cross section to show all change in grades
(d) Landscaping Details;
(e) Other Utilities – Gas, Telstra, Electricity, Fibre Optic Cable locations, Depths, Easements and heights in comparison to the roads centre line;
(f) Survey Mark Details – Marker Numbers and AHD.
Note: Tie details must include depth, distance into the property and distance from a specified property boundary.
(23) For each lot created, a separate Lot Plan (A4) shall be submitted to Council which shows the location (distance away from nearest side boundary and distance into the lot), level, depth and diameter of tie details for water, sewer and stormwater and as well easement details.
(24) Constructed Asset Information shall be supplied for all assets dedicated to Council. The required information shall include:
Roads
· Length, width, gravel depth;
· Earthworks cost;
· Pavement cost;
· Seal cost;
· Guidepost numbers and cost;
· Raised pavement markers numbers and cost;
· Guardrail type, size in metres and cost;
· Signposts cost;
· Kerb and gutter length and cost
· Footpath cycleway length, width and cost;
· Open drainage works length and cost;
Stormwater Drainage
· Pipe type, length and cost;
· Pit type, number and cost;
· Headwalls, number and cost;
· Rockwork area and cost;
· Stormwater quality improvement features, type, number and component costs.
Sewerage Infrastructure
· Pipe type, length and cost;
· Pit type, number and cost;
· Pump well type and cost;
· Electrical and Control equipment type and cost;
· Backup generator type and cost;
· Monitoring equipment type and cost.
Water Supply Infrastructure
· Pipe type, length and cost;
· Valve type, number and cost;
· Hydrant type, number and cost;
Other Assets
· Description, dimensions and cost e.g. Horse bridle path
(25) A bank guarantee, or cash bond, equivalent to 5% of the value of the whole of the engineering works shall be lodged with Council as a performance bond.
Note: This bond must be unconditional with no time limit and must be in the name of the developer (i.e. bonds in the name of the construction contractor will not be accepted).
Note: This bond shall be held for the period of the defects liability period (at least 12 months), which will commence from the later of linen plan release from Council or the practical completion of the engineering works (as evidenced by the associated engineering compliance certificate).
Note: At the end of the defects liability period a final compliance inspection will be undertaken. Areas inspected may include the following:
· Roadside drainage;
· Piped drainage;
· Water quality or retention systems/devices;
· Sealed road surface condition including excessive loose gravel;
· Road signs and lines;
· Sub-grade failures (e.g. soft spot);
· Roadside landscaping.
(26) The identified Aboriginal sites must be registered on Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System (AHIMS) register. Evidence of registration shall be provided to Council.
(27) A Subdivision Certificate Application (Form 206) must be submitted to Council.
The application is to be accompanied by the following:
(a) A plan of subdivision (linen plan) acceptable for registration by the NSW Land and Property Information Office.
(b) An Administration Sheet which incorporates a subdivision certificate acceptable for registration by the NSW Land and Property Information Office.
(c) Where easements, rights of carriageway or restrictions on the use of land are proposed or required to be created under Section 88 of the Conveyancing Act 1919, a copy of the relevant instrument.
(d) The relevant documents required by the NSW Land and Property Information Office for the registration of a Community scheme or a Strata scheme, if applicable.
(e) The applicant must create, where applicable, 20 metre wide easements over the final plan of subdivision in favour of Essential Energy, centred on all existing power lines which cross the subdivision.
(f) A copy of relevant development consent or complying development certificate.
(g) A copy of any relevant construction certificate.
(h) A copy of any relevant compliance certificates, letters from authorities and receipts for payment of any fees/contributions.
(i) A copy of detailed subdivision engineering plans, where relevant.
(j) Evidence that the applicant has complied with all conditions of consent that it is required to comply with before a subdivision certificate can be issued.
(k) For subdivision involving subdivision work, evidence that the work has been completed, or:
· Agreement has been reached with the relevant consent authority as to payment of the cost of work and as to the time for carrying out the work, or
· Agreement has been reached with the relevant consent authority as to security to be given to the consent authority with respect to the completion of the work.
(l) The relevant fee payment at the date of application for the subdivision certificate.
(28) The subdivision certificate will not be issued until all conditions of this consent have been complied with in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
6.6 Development Application No DA190211 - Importation of Material for Internal Access Roads, 33 Hillview Drive, Murrumbateman
SUMMARY
To present an update on the Development Application for the importation of material for internal access roads at ‘Hillview’, 33 Hillview Drive, Murrumbateman. Council resolved to support the Development Application in May 2020 subject to additional information being submitted. The Applicant has not provided satisfactory additional information and therefore it is recommended that the Development Application now be formally refused.
That Development Application DA190211 for the importation of material and construction of internal access roads at ‘Hillview’, 33 Hillview Drive, Murrumbateman be refused as insufficient information has been submitted to enable the appropriate assessment under the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016. |
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Resources for development assessment are provided for in the current Operational Plan.
POLICY & LEGISLATION
· Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979
· Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000
· Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016
· Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997
· Protection of the Environment Operation (Waste) Regulation 2014
· Water Management Act 2000
· Roads Act 1993
· State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007
· Yass Valley Local Environmental Plan 2013
· Resource Recovery Exemption – Excavated Natural Material Exemption 2014
· Resource Recovery Order – Excavated Natural Material Order 2014
· Yass Valley Heavy Haulage Section 94 Contributions Plan 2006
· Yass Valley Community Engagement Strategy
· Application Assessment and Decision Making Policy
· Draft Filling on Rural Properties Policy
REPORT
1. Application Details
Date Received |
- |
3 December 2019 |
Land |
- |
‘Hillview’ - 33 Hillview Drive, Murrumbateman |
Area |
- |
Approximately 1,900ha |
Zoning |
- |
RU1 Primary Production |
2. Site Description and Locality
The development site is ‘Hillview’, a significant property of approximately 1,900ha north of the Murrumbateman Village. The property contains land to the north and south of Hillview Drive, as well as west of the Barton Highway. A locality plan is included as Attachment A.
The property is used for agricultural purposes, containing farm buildings and infrastructure as well as manager’s residences. The portion north of Hillview Drive is serviced by three primary property accesses. The portion to the west of the Barton Highway has direct access from the highway.
3. Background and Proposal
In May 2020 meeting Council resolved that:
1. Conditional Development Consent be issued for the importation of material and construction of internal access roads at “Hillview”, 33 Hillview Drive, Murrumbateman following:
· The Applicant suitably demonstrating that the proposed development does not trigger entry into the Biodiversity Offset Scheme under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016
· The Applicant suitably demonstrating how they have undertaken due diligence for the protection of Aboriginal objects.
2. The Development Consent restricts the standard of internal access road construction to generally 4.5m x 300mm and an overall maximum volume of material that can be imported to 40,000m3 and the need for an Engineering Construction design for internal roads is not required.
The Applicant submitted additional information on 26 May 2020 but a review indicated that it was insufficient. Planning staff provided further detailed advice and another additional information request on 29 May 2020. In August 2020 planning staff request an update on the progress of the additional information, however no reply was received. A final additional information request was issued on 7 October 2020 for information to be submitted by no later than 7 November 2020. Additional information nor a reply have been received.
4. Conclusion
Without the requested additional information it is not possible for a complete assessment to occur under the provisions of s4.15 Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 or to conclusively determine whether the proposed development triggers entry into the NSW Biodiversity Offset Scheme under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016.
Given the additional information has not be received, the number of requests, and the time that has now elapsed, it is recommended that the Development Application be formally refused on the basis of having insufficient information.
Key Pillar 1. Our Environment
CSP Strategy EN1 - Protect and enhance the existing natural environment, including flora and fauna native to the region
Delivery Program Action EN1.1 - Protect our natural assets in line with community values
Operational Plan Activity EN1.1.1 – Ensure assessment of development applications protects our natural environment
ATTACHMENTS: a. Locality Plan ⇩
6.6 Development Application No DA190211 - Importation of Material for Internal Access Roads, 33 Hillview Drive, Murrumbateman
Attachment a Locality Plan
Ordinary Council Meeting 25 November 2020
A report recommending grants to be made through Council’s Community Grants Program.
Council allocated $49,000 to Community Grants in the 2020/21 budget. The recommended grants total $28,362, leaving a further $20,638 available.
· Local Government Act 1993
· Community Grants Policy
REPORT A total of 13 applications were received and assessed by a panel comprising Cr Turner, Cr Frost and the Community Planner.
The panel members declared no pecuniary and non-pecuniary interests in the applications.
Two applications are not recommended for funding in the current round of community grants i.e.
· Expenditure on Berinba School P&C’s proposed new playground will not occur in the coming 12 months – a requirement of Council’s Community Grants Policy
· The Sutton Pony Club’s proposal to construct a roof between two shipping containers is not supported by quotes and requires development approval
The other applications meet the eligibility criteria.
Not all of the funding pool for Community Grants will be expended with the awarding of the eligible applications. A second round of Community Grants could be organised in the New Year or alternatively Council may wish to direct the funding to some identified priorities.
Key Pillar 3. Our Community
CSP Strategy CO2 - Encourage and facilitate active and creative participation in community life
Delivery Program Action CO2.5 - Support the growth of a diverse range of community events
Operational Plan Activity CO2.5.1 - Provide access to financial support for development of community events through Council's Community Grants Program
ATTACHMENTS: a. 2020-21 Community Grants Assessment Schedule ⇩
To present a request seeking consideration of introducing a rebate program to encourage the use of cloth nappies.
RECOMMENDATIONThat the introduction of a cloth nappy rebate scheme be considered as part of the 2021/22 budget process. |
There are no resources in the current Operational Plan to commence a rebate scheme.
· Local Government Act 1993
· Environmental Sustainability Policy
A request has been received suggesting Council introduce a program to encourage the use of cloth nappies instead of disposables.
Several Councils in Victoria, Queensland, NSW and South Australia offer cloth nappy rebates. This is usually up to a 50% rebate and is available until the allocated funds are exhausted.
Reuse products are preferable to disposable items and will contribute to reducing the amount of waste to landfill. This is consistent with Council’s Environmental Sustainability Policy.
There are approximately 6% (or 1,000 people) of the Yass Valley population that are babies/pre-schoolers (i.e. 0-4 years old). With each baby using approximately 6,500 nappies until fully toilet trained this represents a potential of 6.5M nappies being disposed of to landfill. If the 6.5M nappies were all disposable this is estimated to generate 1,000 tonnes of waste (6,500 nappies = 1 tonne of waste).
The use of cloth nappies, while reducing disposal to landfill, will increase water use for individual households.
In metropolitan areas (such as Canberra) there are nappy washing services but this generally do not extend into rural and regional area. Local advocacy by residents directly to service providers for an extension of their services into Yass Valley could be encouraged.
There are no funds in the 2020/21 budget to offer rebates for cloth nappies. However this could be considered as part of a future budget process.
Key Pillar 1. Our Environment
CSP Strategy EN5 - To investigate and implement approaches to reduce our carbon footprint
Delivery Program Action EN5.1 - Reduce rubbish to landfill through effective waste management and recycling
Operational Plan Activity EN5.1.1 - Finalise strategy to reduce waste going to landfill
Ordinary Council Meeting 25 November 2020
7.2 Local Roads & Community Infrastructure Grant - Extension of Program
SUMMARY
To determine the allocation of funds of $1,020,648 provided by Australian Government under the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure (LRCI) Program.
That: 1. The Local Roads & Community Infrastructure Extension Program grant for the amount of $1,020,648 be accepted. 2. The projects listed in Option 6 of this report form the basis of Council’s application under the Local Roads & Community Infrastructure Extension Program. |
Financial IMPLICATIONS
Nil - All works will be funded by grant funding.
POlicy & Legislation
· Procurement Policy
· Local Roads & Community Infrastructure Grant - Extension Program Guidelines
REPORT
The Local Roads & Community Infrastructure (LRCI) Program aims to assist a community led recovery from COVID-19 by supporting local jobs, firms and procurement. It is expected Councils, where possible will use local businesses and workforces to deliver projects under the LRCI Program to ensure stimulus funds flow into local communities.
Council has previously received $857,227 under the program, which was reported to the Council’s July 2020 meeting.
Advice has recently been received indicating Council has been offered an additional grant of $1,020,648 under an extension of the LRCI Program.
Currently the guidelines for LRCI Program extension are being drafted. However the advice indicates that the funding will be available from 1 January 2021 with the program to be completed by end 2021.
To allow Council to consider projects for nomination and to be ready for when the program commence it has been assumed the program guidelines will be consistent with the original program.
Under the original LRCI program for a project(s) to be eligible for the funding the following requirements must be met:
· In addition to Council’s existing 2020/21 works program (for the grant extension it is assumed to also include the 2021/22 works program)
· Be completed by 30 June 2021 (for the extension grant this would be 31 December 2020)
· Deliver benefits to the community
· Eligible road projects including:
General road improvements such as:
§ Construction of new road
§ Sheeting/re-sheeting
§ Reconstruction and rehabilitation
§ Widening, sealing and resealing
§ Drainage
Traffic signs and traffic control equipment
Street lighting equipment
A bridge or tunnel
· Eligible community works including:
Bicycle and walking paths
Repairing and replacing fencing
Improved accessibility
Landscaping improvements, picnic sheltered or bbq at parks
Playgrounds, skate parks or toilet blocks
Council staff have prepared the following the list of potential future works that would:
· Satisfy the assumed grant requirements and guidelines
· Be deliverable by end December 2021 allowing work that can be readily delivered and can be managed by Council’s resources noting that Council pre-existing project commitment (excluding water and sewer projects) for 2021 (calendar year) includes in excess of 50 capital projects with a the value of approximately $28M
· Noting the number of complaints being received from rural residents in relation to the conditions of our unsealed road network due to the lack of gravel
· Noting that the Memorial Hall will be celebrating its centennial in the near future
· Noting Murrumbateman will be subject to separate funding announcements in the near future
· Potential for projects to be funded under alternate grant programs include Stronger Country Communities Grant may 100% fund Riverbank Park amenities, Bookham amenities and Murrumbateman Recreation Ground irrigation work. Community Infrastructure funded through Office Responsible Gambling may part fund Binalong Fitness projects or Bookham Oval projects
Asset |
Project Name |
Project Cost - $ |
Rural Unsealed Road Network |
Gravel re-sheeting |
$1,020,000 |
Memorial Hall |
Replace main hall's timber floor |
$120,000 |
Replace air conditioning |
$30,000 |
|
New commercial kitchen |
$55,000 |
|
Painting (internal and external) |
$90,000 |
|
Front office renovations |
$25,000 |
|
Sub-total |
$320,000 |
|
Murrumbateman Recreation Ground |
Install oval irrigation and header tank |
$250,000 |
Riverbank Park |
New amenities |
$300,000 |
Binalong Recreation Ground |
Fitness station Stage 1 - 6 stations including matted attenuation zone |
$50,000 |
Fitness station Stage 2 - 6 stations including matted attenuation |
$50,000 |
|
Sub-total |
$100,000 |
|
Bookham Oval |
Resurface Tennis Courts, |
$100,000 |
Upgrade Amenities Building |
$40,000 |
|
Sub-total |
$140,000 |
|
Bookham Reserve |
New playground |
$60,000 |
A Councillor Workshop on 16 November 2020 discussed potential projects under the grant program. From the discussions the following options have been developed:
Option 1
Asset |
Project Name |
Project Cost - $ |
Rural Unsealed Road Network |
Gravel re-sheeting |
$1,020,648 |
Total |
$1,020,648 |
Option 2
Asset |
Project Name |
Project Cost - $ |
Rural Unsealed Road Network |
Gravel re-sheeting |
$600,000 |
Memorial Hall |
Replace main hall's timber floor |
$120,000 |
Riverbank Park |
New amenities |
$300,648 |
Total |
$1,020,648 |
Option 3
Asset |
Project Name |
Project Cost - $ |
Rural Unsealed Road Network |
Gravel re-sheeting |
$600,000 |
Memorial Hall |
Replace main hall's timber floor |
$120,000 |
Binalong Recreation Ground |
Fitness stations Stages 1 & 2 |
$100,000 |
Bookham Oval |
Tennis courts and amenities |
$140,000 |
Bookham Reserve |
New playground |
$60,648 |
Total |
$1,020,648 |
Option 4
Asset |
Project Name |
Project Cost - $ |
Rural Unsealed Road Network |
Gravel re-sheeting |
$520,000 |
Memorial Hall |
Replace air conditioning |
$30,000 |
New commercial kitchen |
$55,000 |
|
Front office renovations |
$25,000 |
|
Painting |
$90,000 |
|
Riverbank Park |
New amenities |
$300,648 |
Total |
$1,020,648 |
Option 5
Asset |
Project Name |
Project Cost - $ |
Rural Unsealed Road Network |
Gravel re-sheeting |
$520,000 |
Memorial Hall |
Replace air conditioning |
$30,000 |
New commercial kitchen |
$55,000 |
|
Front office renovations |
$25,000 |
|
Binalong Recreation Ground |
Fitness stations Stage 1 |
$50,000 |
Bookham Oval |
Upgrade amenities |
$40,000 |
Riverbank Park |
New amenities |
$300,648 |
Total |
$1,020,648 |
Option 6
Asset |
Project Name |
Project Cost - $ |
Rural Unsealed Road Network |
Gravel re-sheeting |
$730,000 |
Memorial Hall |
Replace air conditioning |
$30,000 |
New commercial kitchen |
$55,000 |
|
Painting |
$90,000 |
|
Front office renovations |
$25,000 |
|
Binalong Recreation Ground |
Fitness stations Stage 1 |
$50,000 |
Bookham Oval |
Upgrade amenities |
$40,648 |
Total |
$1,020,648 |
Based on the project requirements Option 6 is recommended as projects to be submitted for funding under the LRCI Extension Program.
Gravel re-sheeting of unsealed roads is an essential requirement to ensure that a grading intervention can be effective. Approximately a quarter or 150 km of Council’s unsealed road network was gravel re-sheeted as part of the repair works from the September 2016 declared natural disaster storm event. As a result the of a report that was presented to Council to stop the 2018/19 and 2019/20 re-sheeting program, which eventually also flowed into a no gravel re-sheeting program for 2020/21.
After almost a three year period of no gravel re-sheeting, Council is receiving numerous complaints in relation to the effectiveness of our annual grading program as, in many cases, there is insufficient gravel on the road to allow the removal of pot-holes and corrugations, The allocation of this funding to gravel re-sheeting will be the first step in re-establishing an annual re-sheeting program for the unsealed road network.
A new kitchen in Memorial Hall will improve the usability of the building. Air condition of the hall will increase operating costs which would need to be passed on through user charges or by reducing service levels in other programs.
The communities of Binalong and Bookham have not received funding in earlier programs.
Key Pillar 4. Our Infrastructure
CSP Strategy IN3 - Maintain and improve road infrastructure and connectivity
Delivery Program Action IN3.1 - Deliver transport asset infrastructure, maintenance, renewal and enhancement programs for urban, rural and regional roads to maintain or improve overall condition
Operational Plan Activity IN3.1.1 - Develop and deliver annual programs for urban, rural and regional road renewal and construction, including bridges and stormwater
Ordinary Council Meeting 25 November 2020
8.1 1st Quarter Budget Review 2019/20
SUMMARY
This report represents the 1st Quarterly Budget Review Statement (QBRS) for the period 1 July 2020 to 30 September 2020 in the financial year ending 30 June 2021.
That: 1. The 1st Quarterly Budget Review Statement adjustments, as detailed in the attachments, be adopted and the relevant income and expenditure budget adjustments be approved. 2. In accordance with the Local Government (General) Regulation (NSW) Clause 203 (2)(a), Council’s financial position as at 30 September 2020 is satisfactory, having regard to revised projected estimates of income and expenditure, and the original budgeted income and expenditure. |
Financial IMPLICATIONS
Full details of the financial implications of this quarter’s QBRS are contained within the following report.
POlicy & Legislation
· Local Government Act 1993
· Local Government General Regulation 2005
· QBRS Guidelines, Office of Local Government 2010
REPORT
1. Background
In accordance with Clause 203 (Budget Review Statements and Revision of Estimates) Local Government (General) Regulations 2005:
(1) Not later than 2 months after the end of each quarter, the responsible accounting officer of a Council must prepare and submit to the Council a budget review statement that shows, by reference to the estimate of income and expenditure set out in the Council’s Revenue Policy included in the Operational Plan for the relevant year, a revised estimate of the income and expenditure for that year.
(2) A budget review statement must include or be accompanied by:
(a) A report as to whether or not the responsible accounting officer believes that the statement indicates that the financial position of the Council is satisfactory, having regard to the original estimate of income and expenditure; and
(b) If that position is unsatisfactory, recommendation for remedial action.
In accordance with Clause 211 (Authorisation of expenditure) Local Government (General) Regulations 2005:
(1) A council, or a person purporting to act on behalf of a council, must not incur a liability for the expenditure of money unless the council at the annual meeting held in accordance with subclause (2) or at a later ordinary meeting:
(a) has approved the expenditure, and
(b) has voted the money necessary to meet the expenditure.
2. Budget Review
The Quarterly Budget Review Statement (QBRS) presents a summary of Council’s financial position at the end of the first quarter for the financial year ended 30 June 2021.
The quarterly budget review process is the mechanism through which Council and the community are informed of Council’s progress against the Operational Plan (annual budget), together with recommendations for changes and reasons for any budget variations.
The QBRS appears as Attachment A, and has been produced in accordance with the guidelines and standards issued by the Office of Local Government.
Council is provided with a breakdown of the budget and actuals by functional/service unit and key performance indicators (financial ratios). Staff have undertaken a mapping process to ensure this information is accurate.
2.1 Summary
Council’s operational revenue is currently $25.3M which is well below the forecast of $53.2M. This variance is expected due to the timing of receipt of grant funding, with funds being received after milestones have been met. Operational expenditure of $5.3M is currently $28.3M under budget, which is readily attributable to the seasonal, semi-annual, and annual nature of some expenditures and the delay to some work due to weather events.
Capital Revenue is $4.2M which is $15.7M under budget. This is due to the timing of the grant payments being received, and dependent on the achievement of relevant milestones. Capital Expenditure is currently under budget primarily due to this being the first three months of the financial year and the Local Government Area has seen weather events that have impacted the ability to undertake some works and emergency repair work has had to be undertaken as a priority. It is expected that capital expenditure will increase as we progress through the financial year and ramp up as planning and community consultation on some projects are finalised.
2.2 Operational Budget Result
As a result of this budget review, Council’s projected year end net operating result before capital items is expected to reduce from a budgeted surplus of $536k to a budgeted deficit of $314k for 2020/21. The primary driver of this is an increase in projected Capital Grants and Contributions to approximately $20M which erodes Council’s Net Operating surplus for the year before grant and contributions provided for capital purposes, resulting in a projected deficit.
These funds have been fast tracked to Council as part of the State and Federal Government’s initiative to stimulate the economy due to the impact of COVID-19.
2.3 Capital Budget Result
As a result of this budget review, Council’s anticipated expenditure on capital items is expected to increase by $18.2M to $37.11M for 2020/21. This increase is a result of capital works planned for 2019/20 but were unable to be finished and as such were carried forward into 2020/21. Additional grant funding has also been secured to fund Infrastructure works including upgrades to local roads, bridge renewal and the Yass to Murrumbateman Water network construction.
2.4 Commentary on Key Variances
Some adjustments have been done to the budget line items to better reflect the nature of the budget item and where it should sit on the face of the Income Statement. Some costs have been reallocated as Capital expenditure to better reflect the nature of the work involved.
Income has increased due to additional grant funding becoming available and some grants not being accurately reflected in the original budget due to actual figures not being available at the time.
Capital works with a value of $2.9M have been added to the capital expenditure budget. These works comprise $946k to be spent on upgrades to Wee Jasper Road, Nanima Road, $1.856M to be spent on upgrades to Yass Valley Way, $800k towards Shingle Hill Way Bridge Replacement, approximately $175k to be spent on the design work for future roads capital works and approximately $130k to be spent on traffic facilities.
Key Pillar 5. Our Civic Leadership
CSP Strategy CL1 - Effect resourceful and respectful leadership and attentive representation of the community
Delivery Program Action CL1.4 - Be compliant, more efficient and effective
Operational Plan Activity CL1.4.2 - All regulated compliance is adhered to
ATTACHMENTS: a. 2020/21 Quarter 1 Budget Review Statement ⇩
Ordinary Council Meeting 25 November 2020
8.2 Investment and Borrowings Report
SUMMARY
In accordance with the Clause 212 Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, this report provides a summary of Council’s investments as at 31 October 2020. In accordance with paragraph (1)(b), it can be certified that the investments listed have been made in accordance with the Act, the Regulations and Council’s Investment Policy.
That the Investment Report as at 31 October 2020 be received and it be noted that the summary has been prepared in accordance with the Act, the Regulations and Council’s Investment Policy. |
Financial IMPLICATIONS
Council’s investment portfolio provides funding for some projects identified in the Operational Plan.
POlicy & Legislation
· s625 Local Government Act 1993
· Clause 212 Local Government (General) Regulation 2005
· Investment Policy
REPORT
Comments on Economic Climate
With speculation that the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) was going to reduce interest rates in early November 2020, institutions were already factoring this into the rates they were offering. On 3 November 2020 the RBA did in fact reduce the official cash rate to an unprecedented low of 0.10%.
As COVID-19 case numbers started to rise in some European nations, restrictions were imposed in France and Germany and there is speculation that the US may be forced to consider similar options. This impacted the recovery of the wider economy with investor confidence reducing. In contrast, case numbers in Australia have dropped back to very low levels which has allowed for the restriction imposed on interstate movements to be relaxed, allowing more economic activity in the region.
The Commonwealth Budget was released in October 2020 and pointed to a budget deficit of 11% of GDP. The bring-forward of personal income tax cuts should provide some support to consumer spending.
Council Investments
Valuations of Council investments are detailed in Attachment A.
Due to the uncertainty around the potential impacts of COVID-19, Council is currently holding a higher than usual balance in its ‘At Call’ accounts.
Council Loans
Council has five loans with balance owing as at 30 June 2020 of $16.782m. The table below provides loan details as at 30 June 2020. Indicative repayments for 2020/21 are shown for both principal and interest for all current loans. Balances will not change on a monthly basis as the most frequent repayment cycle is quarterly.
Key Pillar 5. Our Civic Leadership
CSP Strategy CL1 - Effect resourceful and respectful leadership and attentive representation of the community
Delivery Program Action CL1.6 - Maximise Council’s ability to generate income
Operational Plan Activity CL1.6.3 - Review commercial activities to ensure Council is maximising returns
ATTACHMENTS: a. October 2020 - Investments Report ⇩
9.1 John Lewis Williams Bequest
SUMMARY
To provide an update on the management of the John Lewis Williams bequest for the advancement of the interests of young people of Yass. The executor of the Estate of John Lewis Williams is supportive of the bequest being forwarded to the Yass District Education Foundation.
That: 1. The John Lewis Williams bequest be forwarded to the Yass District Education Foundation to provide financial assistance to young people in Yass Valley for education support and development in their chosen careers. 2. The financial support pro.vide through the Yass District Education Foundation be known as the John Lewis Williams Award and a representative of the Williams family be invites to present the award to the successful recipient(s) annually.
|
Financial IMPLICATIONS
Nil
POlicy & Legislation
· Local Government Act 1993
REPORT
1. Introduction
In October 2020 Council considered a report on the John Lewis Williams Bequest and resolved that:
1. The matter be deferred to the November 2020 Council meeting pending further information
2. A report be prepared for the November 2020 Council meeting regarding the previous handling of bequests
3. The Executor of the John Lewis Williams Estate be invited to address Council
2. Workshop
The executor of the John Lewis Williams Estate addressed Councillors at a workshop on 9 November 2020 confirming support for the funds to be directed to the Yass & District Education Foundation.
From a search of records since Yass Valley Council’s inception in 2004 has not identified any bequests to Council other than the donation of $122,000 from the Estate of John Lewis Williams to support the advancement of young people of Yass. Bequests to Council from local residents have not occurred with any regularity.
Council has applied for grant funding for a Youth Development Officer and if successful space has already been tentatively secured at Zac’s Place in Church Street, Yass. Successful applications are expected to be announced in February 2021.
A suggestion of supporting Anglicare’s Youth Officer by providing a meeting space has been made. Anglicare currently occupy office accommodation at the Rae Burgess Centre. The brief for the proposed Civic Precinct includes provision for community meeting spaces which could be made available for any future youth program.
3. Other Trusts
Trust funds at other Councils have generally been established with a sizable donation and/or external income stream.
The Veolia Mulwaree Trust was established by annual contributions based on the amount of waste material being deposited at the former Woodlawn Mine in Tarago. These contributions go into a private trust administered by the company to fund community projects across several Local Government Area. The trust comprises representatives from the company, the Mayor of Goulburn Mulwaree and a community representative however it is an independent entity to Council.
In Harden the Geoffrey Kruger Trust was established in 1996 with assets valued at over $9M with the intention of funding improvements for the town of Harden and Murrumburrah. The net assets of the trust are now over $45M. This is a private trust run independently of Hilltops Council but works cooperatively contributing to the funding of a hydrotherapy pool, medical centre for the town as well as funding Council’s economic development program.
Between 1966 and 1979 Armidale City Council received donations of art works from local grazier, Chandler Coventry on the understanding that an art museum would be built to house both his collection and the Howard Hinton art collection. The Armidale community began a long-term fundraising effort to build a dedicated museum with matching grants from the NSW State Government. The New England Regional Art Museum was opened in 1983 to house both collections. The museum was initial managed by a Reserve Trust Board until the Council was appointed as the manager of the Trust. A not-for-profit company limited guarantee took over from Council and continues to manage the museum and collections. This arrangements does not generate funds for local community projects but takes the burden of managing an important art collection off the community.
The Community Enhancement Funds from major wind farm projects provide for regular contributions to be made to Council for community projects. Upper Lachlan Council has been leading the way on these Community Enhancement Funds and administers these funds through a Council Committee. A similar approach has been made at Yass Valley but at this point in time none of the schemes are operational.
4. John Lewis Williams Bequest
In August 2017 Council considered a bequest from the Estate of John Lewis Williams. The Estate donated $122,000 to Council to support the advancement of the interests of young people of Yass.
In March 2019 Council determined to establish a project that advances the interest of young people.
Broadly there were two options for managing the donation i.e.
· Choose a project(s) and use funds for the capital expenditure
· Invest the funds and allocate interest to an annual project
A project with broad youth support proved difficult to identify and interest rates have not generated sufficient funds for an annual project.
Council explored leveraging the funds by pooling the money with its Community Grants and placing the funds under the management of the Foundation for Rural & Regional Renewal. The administration cost associated with this approach outweighed the benefits so Council determined in October 2019 not to proceed with this arrangement.
The bequest is currently held in a Reserve fund with any interest being added annually to the fund. The purpose of this was to give Council the opportunity to explore options on how best the use the funds.
The executor of the Estate of John Lewis Williams, Simon Bernhard, recently approached Council seeking information on how the bequest was being managed. Mr Bernhard was advised that the funds were currently being held in Reserve fund until a suitable project was identified.
The most recent youth survey was undertaken in May 2020. The on-line survey sought to identify the needs and interests of young people and potential projects and activities. From this survey the following priorities were identified:
· Regular movie nights
· Safe place to talk
· Study mentoring
· Learning practical skills
· Comedy night
The survey outcomes formed the basis of a submission to the Youth Opportunities Program for the funding of a Youth Development Officer to assist young people to work on these initiatives.
Mr Bernhard advised that his uncle’s interest was to provide support to youth in Yass and was not interested in a monument and plaque.
As an alternative the Yass District Education Foundation, that provides education support to young people in developing their careers, was suggested as an option. The eligibility is not simply for young people seeking to go to university but extends to TAFE, traineeships, cadetships and apprenticeships. The funding provides financial support to young people in meeting their expenses associated with their chosen study and career.
From the 2020 survey learning practical skills and study mentoring are consistent with the Yass District Education Foundation objectives.
Mr Bernhard is supportive of his late uncle’s bequest being directed to the Yass District Education Foundation. He appreciates that while the donation would not last indefinitely it would provide a legacy for several years and would be directed to young people who could benefit. Mr Bernhard stated that:
I believe working with the Yass District Education Foundation would align with my Uncle’s expectations, and hope the entirety of the Council supports this……..Happy to support both the Foundation and the Council any way I can and look forward to progressing this so we can start helping the youth of Yass.
5. Conclusion
It is recommended that the John Lewis Williams bequest be directed to the Community Education Foundation to be distributed to young people to assist with their education and career development in the Yass District. It should be noted that from 1 October to 30 November 2020 each dollar donation to one of the local foundations will be matched and donated back to the community to a capped amount (refer https://cef.org.au/matched-giving-2020/).
Key Pillar 5. Our Civic Leadership
CSP Strategy CL1 - Effect resourceful and respectful leadership and attentive representation of the community
Delivery Program Action CL1.2 - Address the community’s needs in a sustainable manner
Operational Plan Activity CL1.2.3 - Alignment with annual reporting measures
Ordinary Council Meeting 25 November 2020
9.2 Water Rebate Application - Lot 7141 DP1095199 off Wee Jasper Road, Yass
A request has been received seeking a further rebate for an undetected water leak at Lot 7141 DP1095199 off Wee Jasper Road, Yass. A rebate has already been granted in accordance with Council’s Rebate of Undetected Water Leaks Policy.
The total water charge for the property was $12,567.50. A rebate under Council Policy of $5,396.93 credit has been applied to the account.
· Rebate for Undetected Water Leaks Policy
A request has been received seeking further consideration of a request for a water rebate.
The property is a rural holding off Wee Jasper Road and is adjacent to the Transgrid Sub Station.
In June 2020 the water bill for the property was $12,567.50. The excess water use was due to an undetected water pipe leak. This has since been repaired. A rebate under the policy has been applied to the account as a $5,396.93 credit.
As the request relates to a hardship matter it is recommended that the matter be considered in Closed Session.
Key Pillar 5. Our Civic Leadership
CSP Strategy CL1 - Effect resourceful and respectful leadership and attentive representation of the community
Delivery Program Action CL1.6 - Maximise Council’s ability to generate income
Operational Plan Activity CL1.6.2 - Review fees and charges to ensure user pay principles are adopted where possible
Ordinary Council Meeting 25 November 2020
9.3 Tender Evaluation Report - Wellington Road Sewage Pump Station Tender RFQ 10014861
This report provides information on the tender submissions for the construction of the new Wellington Road Sewage Pump Station (SPS). The report also provides information on provision of project management and specialist technical services by Public Works Advisory.
Funds have been allocated in the 2020/21 Operational Plan for construction of Wellington Road Sewer Pump Station (SPS).
· Local Government Act 1993
· Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979
· Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000
· State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007
· Development Servicing Plan (Sewerage) 2013
1. Background
Wellington Road catchment was identified for provision of sewerage services in the current Development Servicing Plan (Sewerage) 2013.
The Sewage Pump Station (SPS) is required to service up to 400 new residential lots. Due to design requirements, the pump station will be constructed in stages to service 200 lots initially. To service the ultimate 400 lots, additional pump and switch board upgrades will be necessary in future. The plans for the SPS are included in Attachment A. Construction works are expected to take up to 46 weeks due to difficult terrain.
To support delivery of the NSW Public Works Advisory (PWA) were engaged to prepare a Concept Design, Review of Environmental Factors report, detailed design, tender documents and to assist with assessment of construction tenders.
Under SEPP (Infrastructure) 2007 development of the purpose of sewage reticulation systems can be carried out without Consent on any land in prescribed circumstances.
A Review of Environmental Factors (REF) was prepared in accordance with s5.5 and s5.7 Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 which requires the proponent take into account to the fullest extent possible all matters affecting or likely to affect the environment due to construction and operation of the proposed activity. The REF is to consider matters listed in Cl 228 Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000. The REF (refer Attachment B under Separate Cover) did not identify any matters precluding construction of the facility. Specific mitigation measures detailed in the REF will be incorporated during construction.
2. Tender Period
Tenders were called on 12 August 2020 and closed on 24 September 2020. A mandatory pre tender meeting was held on 31 August 2020.
3. Tender Submissions
Tenders were opened on 28 September 2020. Five tenders were received from the following organisations:
NAME OF TENDERER (Alphabetical) |
Address |
Comdain Civil Constructions Pty Ltd. (ABN 38 092 269 040) |
16 McKenzie Road, ECHUCA Vic 3564 |
Metwest Engineering Pty Ltd. (ABN 85 068 615 690) |
PO Box 866 ST MARYS NSW 1790 |
Murphy McCarthy Associates Pty Ltd. (ABN 23 086 673 136) |
43 Hubert Street LEICHARDT NSW 2048 |
Springfield Trading Pty Ltd. (ABN 78 621 304 050) |
PO Box 5893 MINTO NSW 2566 |
TWS Evolution Pty Ltd. (ABN 14 637 399 029) |
PO Box 14 BLAYNEY NSW 2799 |
The tender evaluation process and recommendation of a preferred tenderer is included as a separate report to the Closed Session of this meeting. The current PWA engagement is coming to an end and a proposal for ongoing project management and technical support during delivery of the works is also provided in the report to Closed Session.
Key Pillar 4. Our Infrastructure
CSP Strategy IN6 - Implement safe, accessible, and efficient management and recycling options for general waste, green waste, and sewage
Delivery Program Action IN6.1 - Provide and operate a quality sewer network. Cater for growth and quality enhancements that address the community needs
Operational Plan Activity IN6.1.2 - Operate an efficient sewerage management network
ATTACHMENTS: a. Wellington Road SPS Plan and Elevation ⇩
b. Wellington Road SPS Review of Environmental Factors (Under Separate Cover) ⇨
9.3 Tender Evaluation Report - Wellington Road Sewage Pump Station Tender RFQ 10014861
Attachment a Wellington Road SPS Plan and Elevation
9.4 Leasing of Council Property - 'Hawthorn', Barton Highway, Murrumbateman
SUMMARY
The current five year lease of Hawthorn property expires on 31 January 2021. Yass Real Estate was engaged to undertake a tender process seeking submissions for a five year lease on the property.
This item be classified as Confidential in accordance with Section 10A(2)(di) of the Local Government Act 1993, which permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
Financial IMPLICATIONS
Income from the lease will be adjusted in the 3rd quarter budget review as required.
POlicy & Legislation
· Leasing of Council Property Policy
REPORT
1. Background
Council owned property ‘Hawthorn’ at Murrumbateman is currently leased for agricultural purposes.
Yass Plains Pty Ltd is the current lessee of Hawthorn under the current five year lease with is due to expire on 31 January 2021. As per the requirements of the lease agreement, the required ‘Notice to Vacate’ has been provided to the lessee.
2. Tender Period
Tenders were called for on 28 September 2020 and closed on 21 October 2020.
3. Tender Submissions
Yass Real Estate was appointed to independently conducted a tender process for a five year lease on the Council owned property including management of the lease over the five period.
The tenders were addressed to and held by Davis Faulkner Lawyers Yass in sealed envelopes until after the close of the tender process. The Principal of Yass real Estate attended the offices of Davis Faulkner lawyers and collected the sealed envelopes and opened both tenders which was witnessed by staff members of Davis Faulkner Lawyers.
Seven prospective tenant enquiries were received, three property inspections were conducted with two tender expressions received.
The tender evaluation and recommendations of a preferred tendered is included in a separate report to the Closed Section of this meeting.
Key Pillar 5. Our Civic Leadership
CSP Strategy CL1 - Effect resourceful and respectful leadership and attentive representation of the community
Delivery Program Action CL1.6 - Maximise Council’s ability to generate income
Operational Plan Activity CL1.6.3 - Review commercial activities to ensure Council is maximising returns
Ordinary Council Meeting 25 November 2020
12.1 Minutes of the General Manager's Performance Review held on 10 November 2020
REPORT
The General Manager’s Performance Review Committee meeting was held on 10 November 2020. As this meeting relates to a personnel matter concerning a particular individual it is recommended that the matter be dealt with in Closed Session.
That this item be classified as Confidential in accordance with Section 10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act 1993, which permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors). |
Ordinary Council Meeting 25 November 2020
12.2 Minutes of the Local Emergency Management Committee and Rescue Committee Meetings Held on 20 October 2020
REPORT
The minutes of the Local Emergency Management Committee and Rescue Committee meetings held on 20 October 2020 are included in Attachments A and B.
From these minutes there are no items which covers matters that:
· Requires expenditure not provided for in the current Operational Plan
· Involves a variation to a Council policy
· Is contrary to a previous decision or position of Council
· Relates to a matter which requires Council to form a view or adopt a position
· Deals with a matter of specific interest
That the minutes of the Local Emergency Management Committee and Rescue Committee meetings held on 20 October 2020 be noted. |
ATTACHMENTS: a. Rescue Committee Minutes 20 October 2020 ⇩
b. Local Emergency Management Committee Minutes 20 October 2020 ⇩
12.2 Minutes of the Local Emergency Management Committee and Rescue Committee Meetings Held on 20 October 2020
Attachment a Rescue Committee Minutes 20 October 2020
12.2 Minutes of the Local Emergency Management Committee and Rescue Committee Meetings Held on 20 October 2020
Attachment b Local Emergency Management Committee Minutes 20 October 2020
12.3 Minutes of the Canberra Region Joint Organisation Board Meeting held on 26 October 2020
REPORT
The minutes of the Canberra Region Joint Organisation (CRJO) Board meeting held on 26 October 2020 are included in Attachment A.
From these minutes there are no items which cover matters that:
· Requires expenditure not provided for in the current Operational Plan
· Involves a variation to a Council policy
· Is contrary to a previous decision or position of Council
· Relates to a matter which requires Council to form a view or adopt a position
· Deals with a matter of specific interest
That the Minutes of the Canberra Region Joint Organisation Board meeting held on 26 October 2020 be noted. |
ATTACHMENTS: a. Canberra Region Joint Organisation Board Minutes 26 October 2020 ⇩
12.3 Minutes of the Canberra Region Joint Organisation Board Meeting held on 26 October 2020
Attachment a Canberra Region Joint Organisation Board Minutes 26 October 2020
12.4 Minutes of the Audit, Risk & Improvement Committee Meeting held on 27 October 2020
REPORT
The minutes of the Audit, Risk & Improvement Committee meeting held on 27 October 2020 are included in Attachment A.
From these minutes there are no items which cover matters that:
· Requires expenditure not provided for in the current Operational Plan
· Involves a variation to a Council policy
· Is contrary to a previous decision or position of Council
· Relates to a matter which requires Council to form a view or adopt a position
· Deals with a matter of specific interest
That the Minutes of the Audit, Risk & Improvement Committee meeting held on 27 October 2020 be noted. |
ATTACHMENTS: a. Audit, Risk & Improvement Committee Minutes 27 October 2020 ⇩
12.4 Minutes of the Audit, Risk & Improvement Committee Meeting held on 27 October 2020
Attachment a Audit, Risk & Improvement Committee Minutes 27 October 2020
12.5 Minutes of the Country Mayors Association held on 6 November 2020
REPORT
The minutes of the Country Mayors Association Annual General Meeting and General Meeting held on 6 November 2020 are included in Attachments A and B. An update from Cr Linda Scott, President LGNSW is also provided at Attachment C.
From these minutes there are no items which covers matters that:
· Requires expenditure not provided for in the current Operational Plan
· Involves a variation to a Council policy
· Is contrary to a previous decision or position of Council
· Relates to a matter which requires Council to form a view or adopt a position
· Deals with a matter of specific interest
That the Minutes of the Country Mayors Association Annual General Meeting and General Meeting held on 6 November 2020 be noted. |
ATTACHMENTS: a. Country Mayors Association Annual General Meeting Minutes 6 November 2020 ⇩
b. Country Mayors Asociation General Meeting Minutes 6 November 2020 ⇩
c. Local Government NSW Update ⇩
12.5 Minutes of the Country Mayors Association held on 6 November 2020
Attachment a Country Mayors Association Annual General Meeting Minutes 6 November 2020
of NEW SOUTH WALES
Chairperson: Cr Ken Keith
PO Box 337 Parkes NSW 2870
02 6861 2333
ABN 92 803 490 533
AGM Minutes
Annual General Meeting
FRIDAY, 6 November 2020, Cockle Bay Room, International Convention Centre, Sydney
The meeting opened at 9.05 a.m.
1. Attendance:
Armidale Regional Council, Mr Viv May, Administrator
Armidale Regional Council, Mr John Rayner, Acting CEO
Berrigan Shire Council, Cr Matthew Hannan, Mayor
Bland Shire Council, Cr Brian Monaghan, Mayor
Blayney Shire Council, Cr Scott Ferguson, Mayor
Blayney Shire Council, Ms Rebecca Ryan, General Manager
Broken Hill City Council, Cr Darriea Turley, Mayor
Cabonne Shire Council, Cr Kevin Beatty, Mayor
Cabonne Shire Council, Mr Brad Burns, General Manager
Coffs Harbour City Council, Cr Denise Knight, Mayor
Coffs Harbour City Council, Cr George Cecato, Deputy Mayor
Coffs Harbour City Council, Mr Stephen McGrath
Coolamon Shire Council, Cr Bruce Hutcheon, Deputy Mayor
Coolamon Shire Council, Mr Tony Donoghue, General Manager
Cootamundra-Gundagai Regional Council, Cr Abb McAlister Mayor
Cootamundra-Gundagai Regional Council, Mr Phil McMurray, General Manager
Dubbo Regional Council, Cr Ben Shields. Mayor
Dungog Shire Council, Cr John Connors, Mayor
Dungog Shire Council, Mr Gareth Curtis, General Manager
Eurobodalla shire Council, Cr Liz Innes, Mayor
Forbes Shire Council, Cr Phyllis Miller, Mayor
Forbes Shire Council, Cr Chris Roylance, Deputy Mayor
Forbes Shire Council, Mr Steve Loane, General Manager
Glen Innes Shire Council, Cr Carol Sparkes, Mayor
Gunnedah Shire Council, Cr Jamie Chaffey, Mayor
Gwydir Shire Council, Cr John Coulton, Mayor
Gwydir, Shire Council, Mr Max Eastcott, General Manager
Hay Shire Council, Cr Jenny Dwyer, Mayor
Hay Shire Council, Mr David Webb, General Manager
Kempsey Shire Council, Cr Liz Campbell, Mayor
Kempsey Shire Council, Mr Craig Milburn, General Manager
Leeton Shire Council, Cr Paul Maytom , Mayor
Leeton Shire Council, Ms Jackie Kruger, General Manager
Lithgow City Council, Cr Wayne McAndrew, Deputy Mayor
Lithgow City Council, Mr Craig Butler, General Manager
Liverpool Plains Shire Council, Cr Doug Hawkins, Mayor
Liverpool Plains Shire Council, Ms Joanna Sangster, General Manager
Moree Plains Shire Council, Cr Katrina Humphries, Mayor
Murray River Council, Cr Christopher Bilkey, Mayor
Murray River Council, Cr Nikki Cohen Deputy Mayor
Murray River Council, Mr Des Bilske, General Manager
Narrabri Shire Council, Cr Ron Campbell, Mayor
Narrabri Shire Council, Mr Stewart Todd, General Manager
Oberon Council, Cr Kathy Sajowitz, Mayor
Oberon Council, Mr Gary Wallace, General Manager
Orange City Council, Cr Reg Kidd, Mayor
Parkes Shire Council, Cr Ken Keith, Mayor
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council, Mr Tim Overall, Mayor
Shoalhaven City Council, Cr Amanda Findley, Mayor
Singleton Council, Cr Sue Moore, Mayor
Singleton Shire Council, Mr Jason Linnane, General Manager
Temora Shire Council, Cr Rick Firman, Mayor
Temora Shire Council, Mr Garry Lavelle, General Manager
Tenterfield Shire Council, Cr Peter Petty, Mayor
Tenterfield Shire Council, Mr Terry Dodds, General Manager
Uralla Shire Council, Cr Michael Pearce, Mayor
Uralla Shire Council, Ms Kate Jessop, General Manager
Warren Shire Council, Milton Quigley, Mayor
Warren Shire Council, Mr Rolly Lawford, Divisional Manager Engineering Services
Warrumbungle Shire Council, Cr Ambrose Doolan, Mayor
Warrumbungle Shire Council, Mr Roger Bailey, General Manager
LGNSW, President, Cr Linda Scott
Apologies:
As read
2. Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting:
RESOLVED that the minutes of the Annual General Meeting held on 1 November 2019 be accepted as a true and accurate record (Singleton Shire Council /Tenterfield Shire Council).
3. Chairman’s Report
Chairperson Cr Katrina Humphries outlined how she enjoyed being Chair for the past four years and thanked everybody for their support during her terms
RESOLVED That the Chairman’s report be received and noted (Moree Plains Shire Council /Tenterfield Shire Council)
4. Secretaries Report – Financial Report
RESOLVED That the financial reports for the 2019/20 year as tabled be accepted (Moree Plains Shire Council Council/ Glen Innes Severn Council)
5. Returning Officer
RESOLVED That the Returning Officer for the conduct of the elections be Mr Allan Burgess (Gwydir Shire Council / Gunnedah Shire Council)
The Chairperson Cr Katrina Humphries vacated the chair
7. Election of Office Bearers
7.1 Chairperson
The Returning Officer advised that he had received one nomination in writing for Cr Ken Keith, Parkes Shire Council, who was nominated by Uralla Shire Council and Kempsey Shire Council The Returning Officer called for any further nominations for the position of Chairperson. No other nominations were received. As there was only one nomination the Returning Officer declared Cr Ken Keith elected Chairman for the 2020/21 year
7.2 Vice Chairperson
The Returning Officer advised that he had received one nomination in writing. for Cr Michael Pearce, Mayor, Uralla Shire Council who was nominated by Parkes Shire Council and Temora Shire Council The Returning Officer called for any further nominations for the position of Vice Chairperson. No other nominations were received. As there was only one nomination the Returning Officer declared Cr Michael Pearce elected as Deputy Chairperson for the 2020/21 year
7.3 Secretary/Public Officer
RESOLVED That Mr Kent Boyd General Manager Parkes Shire Council, be appointed Secretary/Public Officer (Parkes Shire Council / Uralla Shire Council)
7.4 Executive
Nominations for the six positions on the Executive were called for. Nominations were received for Cr Sue Moore Singleton Council, Cr Carol Sparks, Glen Innes Severn Council, Cr Liz Campbell, Kempsey Shire Council, Cr Rick Firman Temora Shire Council, Cr Kathy Sajowitz, Oberon Council, Cr Amanda Findley, Shoalhaven City Council, Cr Jamie Chaffey Gunnedah Shire Council and Cr Peter Petty, Tenterfield Shire Council
RESOLVED That the method of election be by ordinary ballot (Parkes Shire Council/ Uralla Shire Council)
The Chairman Cr Ken Keith took up the position of chairman
Cr Keith thanked Cr Humphries on her four years as Chairman and for the work she did to promote Country Mayors as a voice of rural communities
8. Setting of Annual Membership Fees
RESOLVED That the fees for the 2020/21 year remain at $750 for Councils with a population of 10,000 and over, and Councils with a population of less than 10,000 paying 75% $562.50 (Tenterfield Shire Council / Uralla Shire Council)
8. Secretariat
RESOLVED That Allan Burgess trading as Alkanat Consulting be appointed the Secretariat (Orange City Council / Dubbo Regional Council)
9. Meeting dates for 2021
RESOLVED that the meeting dates for 2021 be 5 March, 28 May, 6 August and 5 November ( Temora Shire Council / Forbes Shire Council)
10. Executive
To allow the counting of votes the AGM was adjourned at 9.35am
The AGM was resumed at 10.31am
Following the count of the votes by the Returning Officer and Cr Linda Scott, President LGNSW the Returning Officer declared the following delegates elected to the Executive for the 2019/20 year
· Cr Jamie Chaffey, Gunnedah Shire Council
· Cr Sue Moore, Singleton Council
· Cr Peter Petty, Tenterfield Shire Council.
· Cr Kathy Sajowitz, Oberon Council
· Cr Liz Campbell, Kempsey Shire Council
· Cr Rick Firman Temora Shire Council
There being no further business the meeting closed at 10.32 am.
Cr Ken Keith
Chairman Country Mayor’s Association of NSW
Attachment b Country Mayors Asociation General Meeting Minutes 6 November 2020
of NEW SOUTH WALES
Chairperson: Cr Ken Keith
PO Box 337 Parkes NSW 2870
02 6861 2333
ABN 92 803 490 533
Minutes
General Meeting
FRIDAY, 6 November 2020 Cockle Bay Room, International Convention Centre, Sydney
The meeting opened at 10.55 a.m.
1 Attendance:
Armidale Regional Council, Mr Viv May, Administrator
Armidale Regional Council, Mr John Rayner, Acting CEO
Berrigan Shire Council, Cr Matthew Hannan, Mayor
Bland Shire Council, Cr Brian Monaghan, Mayor
Blayney Shire Council, Cr Scott Ferguson, Mayor
Blayney Shire Council, Ms Rebecca Ryan, General Manager
Broken Hill City Council, Cr Darriea Turley, Mayor
Cabonne Shire Council, Cr Kevin Beatty, Mayor
Cabonne Shire Council, Mr Brad Burns, General Manager
Coffs Harbour City Council, Cr Denise Knight, Mayor
Coffs Harbour City Council, Cr George Cecato, Deputy Mayor
Coffs Harbour City Council, Mr Stephen McGrath
Coolamon Shire Council, Cr Bruce Hutcheon, Deputy Mayor
Coolamon Shire Council, Mr Tony Donoghue, General Manager
Cootamundra-Gundagai Regional Council, Cr Abb McAlister Mayor
Cootamundra-Gundagai Regional Council, Mr Phil McMurray, General Manager
Dubbo Regional Council, Cr Ben Shields. Mayor
Dungog Shire Council, Cr John Connors, Mayor
Dungog Shire Council, Mr Gareth Curtis, General Manager
Eurobodalla shire Council, Cr Liz Innes, Mayor
Forbes Shire Council, Cr Phyllis Miller, Mayor
Forbes Shire Council, Cr Chris Roylance, Deputy Mayor
Forbes Shire Council, Mr Steve Loane, General Manager
Glen Innes Shire Council, Cr Carol Sparkes, Mayor
Gunnedah Shire Council, Cr Jamie Chaffey, Mayor
Gwydir Shire Council, Cr John Coulton, Mayor
Gwydir, Shire Council, Mr Max Eastcott, General Manager
Hay Shire Council, Cr Jenny Dwyer, Mayor
Hay Shire Council, Mr David Webb, General Manager
Kempsey Shire Council, Cr Liz Campbell, Mayor
Kempsey Shire Council, Mr Craig Milburn, General Manager
Leeton Shire Council, Cr Paul Maytom , Mayor
Leeton Shire Council, Ms Jackie Kruger, General Manager
Lithgow City Council, Cr Wayne McAndrew, Deputy Mayor
Lithgow City Council, Mr Craig Butler, General Manager
Liverpool Plains Shire Council, Cr Doug Hawkins, Mayor
Liverpool Plains Shire Council, Ms Joanna Sangster, General Manager
Moree Plains Shire Council, Cr Katrina Humphries, Mayor
Murray River Council, Cr Christopher Bilkey, Mayor
Murray River Council, Cr Nikki Cohen Deputy Mayor
Murray River Council, Mr Des Bilske, General Manager
Narrabri Shire Council, Cr Ron Campbell, Mayor
Narrabri Shire Council, Mr Stewart Todd, General Manager
Oberon Council, Cr Kathy Sajowitz, Mayor
Oberon Council, Mr Gary Wallace, General Manager
Orange City Council, Cr Reg Kidd, Mayor
Parkes Shire Council, Cr Ken Keith, Mayor
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council, Mr Tim Overall, Mayor
Shoalhaven City Council, Cr Amanda Findley, Mayor
Singleton Council, Cr Sue Moore, Mayor
Singleton Shire Council, Mr Jason Linnane, General Manager
Temora Shire Council, Cr Rick Firman, Mayor
Temora Shire Council, Mr Garry Lavelle, General Manager
Tenterfield Shire Council, Cr Peter Petty, Mayor
Tenterfield Shire Council, Mr Terry Dodds, General Manager
Uralla Shire Council, Cr Michael Pearce, Mayor
Uralla Shire Council, Ms Kate Jessop, General Manager
Warren Shire Council, Milton Quigley, Mayor
Warren Shire Council, Mr Rolly Lawford, Divisional Manager Engineering Services
Warrumbungle Shire Council, Cr Ambrose Doolan, Mayor
Warrumbungle Shire Council, Mr Roger Bailey, General Manager
LGNSW, President, Cr Linda Scott
Apologies:
As submitted
Special Guests:
Professor, Mary O’Kane, NSW Independent Bushfire Inquiry
Peter Duncan AM, Member Independent Panel for the Road Classification Review and Transfer
Hon Mick Veitch MLC, Shadow Minister for Industry and Trade, Rural Roads, Rural Affairs and Western NSW
2. Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting:
RESOLVED that the minutes of the General Meeting held on 6 March 2020 be accepted as a true and accurate record (Singleton Council / Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council)
3. Professor, Mary O’Kane, NSW Independent Bushfire Inquiry
The NSW Bush Fire Inquiry Report by Dave Owens APM and Professor Mary O’Kane has worked to understand what happened during the 2019-20 bush fire season and how it was different to seasons that have come before, and to make 76 recommendations for future improvements to how NSW plans and prepares for, and responds to, bush fires. The season showed us what damage megafires can do, and how dangerous they can be for communities and firefighters. It is clear that we should expect fire seasons like 2019-20, or potentially worse, to happen again.
The 2019-20 bush fire season challenged conventional assumptions. For example, it appears that the extreme dryness of forested regions over large continuous areas was the determining factor in the size of the fires. When taken together with the weather conditions experienced, the fires became extreme, burning through forests and across bare earth. This season also challenged assumptions about how we fight fires. We need to know much more about bush fire suppression methods and how effective they are, especially in the face of megafires like these.
There are important firefighting enhancements needed – more emphasis on getting fires out early; improved backburning protocols, training and information around heavy plant use; the right mix of aerial firefighting assets; and increased aerial night firefighting. There is also a need for improved telecommunications. We need to push available technologies harder, especially fire science, remote sensing, data science and artificial intelligence to equip us better to understand what happens during a bush fire and respond more quickly. Central to the way forward must be improving local preparedness and resilience.
Independent Planning Commission recommendations to continue and Minister has issued a statement of expectation regarding determinations The Commission will be meeting elected officials and management
4. Cr Linda Scott, President, LGNSW
Cr Scott provided a brief on the work of LGNSW and outlined opportunities for further collaboration (Copy Attached)
5. Membership
RESOLVED that Richmond Valley Council be admitted as a member of the Association (Singleton Council/ Tenterfield Shire Council)
6. Correspondence
Outward
(a) The Hon Brad Hazzard, Minister for Health and Medical Research requesting an update on forensic pathology provision in regional areas
(b) Ms Susan Madden, Board Member, Murray Darling Basin Authority. thanking her for her presentation to the 6 March meeting
(c) Lindsay White Hilary Johnson, Directors, Commonwealth Environmental Water office, thanking them for their presentations to the 6 march meeting
(d) The Hon Melinda Pavey MP, Minister for Water, Property and Housing, thanking her for her presentation to the 6 March meeting
(e) Cr R W Sheaffe, Mayor, Hay Shire, advising that his Councils application for membership was successful
(f) Ms Theresa Corbin, Chief Executive Officer, Australian Communications Consumer Action Network thanking her for her presentation to the 6 March meeting
(g) Mr Rob Rogers AFSM, Deputy Commissioner, NSW Rural Fire Services, thanking him for his presentation to the 6 March meeting
(h) Hon Jennifer Gardner, Chairperson, NSW Local Government Grants Commission, thanking her for her presentation to the 6 March meeting
(i) Mr David Harris, Chief Executive Officer, NSW Water, thanking him for his presentation to the 6 March meeting
(j) The Hon John Barilaro MP, Deputy Premier, Minister for Regional New South Wales, Industry and Trade, regarding the necessity to have rail crossings of State Highways at grade in respect to the Inland Rail
(k) The Hon Michael McCormack MP, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister for Infrastructure and Transport and Regional Development, regarding the necessity to have rail crossings of State Highways at grade in respect to the Inland Rail
(l) Cr Bruce Miller, Chair of Board Local Government Super, asking for the Board to assist rural communities by allowing a two year moratorium on the payment of additional contributions to the Defined Benefit Plan
(m) Mr David Smith, Chief Executive Officer, Local Government Super, asking for the Board to assist rural communities by allowing a two year moratorium on the payment of additional contributions to the Defined Benefit Plan
(n) The Hon Mark Coulton MP, Minister for Regional Services, Decentralisation and Local Government, Assistant Trade and Investment Minister, requesting a review of the Financial Assistance Grants criteria to include disability factors for natural disasters such as drought and bush fires
(o) The Hon Shelley Hancock MP, Minister for Local Government, requesting a review of the Financial Assistance Grants criteria to include disability factors for natural disasters such as drought and bush fires
(p) The Hon Shelley Hancock MP, Minister for Local Government, requesting a reply to our letter dated 3 June 2019 regarding Waste to Energy
(q) Ms Felicity Gemmell-Smith, Special Education Programs Manager, GP Synergy, advising that Country Mayors is encouraging members to nominate a staff member as a contact for potential rural doctors
(r) Ms Margaret Crawford, Auditor General, NSW, Re Accounting Requirements of RFS Assets
Inward
(a) Ms Theresa Corbin, Chief Executive Officer, Australian Communications Consumer Action Network Re membership of the Rural Regional and Remote Communications Coalition
(b) The Hon Ben Franklin MLC, Parliamentary Secretary for Energy and the Arts Re the replacement of private electricity poles
(c) Mr Phil Stockwell, Chief Executive Officer, Local Government Super, Re Defined Benefits Contribution
(d) Ms Anne Skewers, Deputy Secretary, Crown Lands, Planning Industry and Environment Re Local Land Agreements
(e) Mr Rob Rogers AFSM, Commissioner, NSW Rural Fire Service, thanking Country Mayors for their appreciation of the Service
(f) The Hon Shelley Hancock MP, Minister for Local Government, regarding contributions to the Defined Benefits Scheme
(g) The Hon Shelley Hancock MP, Minister for Local Government, regarding Waste to Energy
(h) Margaret Crawford, Auditor New South Wales, regarding Reporting of Rural Fire Service assets
NOTED
7. Financial Report
RESOLVED that the financial reports for the last quarter were tabled and accepted (Uralla Shire Council / Bland Shire Council)
8. Peter Duncan AM, Member Independent Panel for the Road Classification Review and Transfer and Commissioner of the independent Planning Commission
In February 2019 the Minister made a commitment to initiate the Road Classification Review and to transfer up to 15,000km of Regional Road to State management The panel was appointed and the draft Terms of Reference released for Council feedback in February 2020. The Terms of Reference and information paper was released in June 2020 with consultation in July/August 2020 Deadline for nominations on all roads proposed for priority and non-priority reclassification and/ or transfer was September 2020. Priority submissions are open to the end of 2020. Submissions for the full round open in March 2021 and close in May 2021 with a final report to the Minister in July 2021. In the next week the Panel will open the priority submission process and priority assessment framework based on six key principles of Future Transport 2056 - Customer focused, Successful places, A strong economy, Safety and performance, Accessible services and Sustainable, and three primary outcomes
- lighten the load on regional councils net better off position for councils, Support regional employment, Support state-wide network improvements. The assessment framework will show how these will be aligned and measured
9. Hon Mick Veitch MLC, Shadow Minister for Industry and Trade, Rural Roads, Rural Affairs and Western NSW
Mr Veitch outlined his experiences of touring regional NSW as the Shadow Minister and meeting with locals. Local Government is at the forefront of their local economies and changes should not find councils worse off financially. Quarterly reports by the Government are to be provided to the Upper House Cost of Council election issues will be referred to the Shadow Minister for Local Government. Some councils want to revert back from amalgamations and a report on the real cost of amalgamations is available. A National Food, Fibre and Security Plan needs to be implemented
10. Distribution of NSW Electoral Districts
RESOLVED that the Association support Leeton Shire Councils submission to the NSW Electoral Commission on the Redistribution of NSW Electoral Districts (Leeton Shire Council/Gunnedah Shire Council)
11. Rural Fire Service Assets
RESOLVED that the Association continue to follow up the advice of the Auditor General that at the end of the 2019/20 reporting cycle the Office will review the technical arguments (Tenterfield Shire Council/Kempsey Shire Council)
12. Destruction of CMA Files
RESOLVED that That the Country Mayors Files to 2010 held by Coffs Harbour City Council be disposed of by Coffs Harbour City Council (Singleton Council/ Forbes Shire Council)
13. IPART Review of Local Government Rating System
RESOLVED that the Association support Bland Shire Councils submission to the Minister for Local Government to not have legislated recommendation 34 of the 2016 IPART Review of the NSW Local Government Rating System (Bland Shire Council/Blaney Shire Council)
14. Emergency Management Reform
RESOLVED That the Association support Eurobodalla Shire Councils submission to the Royal Commission into National Natural Disasters-Local Government and natural disasters (Eurobodalla Shire Council/Tenterfield Shire Council)
15. Federal Government Policy on Water Security
RESOLVED that Country Mayors
(a) Advocate to the Australian Government to increase their funding and involvement in the provision of secure water supply for towns and cities across regional Australia.
(b) Advocate to the NSW Government to waive NSW Government costs associated with essential water infrastructure (Eurobodalla Shire Council/Leeton Shire Council)
16. Enquiry into Rural Health
RESOLVED that Association prepare a submission to the Enquiry into Rural Health and the Minister for Health be invited to the next meeting of Country Mayors (Leeton Shire Council/Gunnedah Shire Council)
17. Local Government Exclusion from National Cabinet
RESOLVED that Country Mayors lobbies the Prime Minister to have Local Government represented on the National Cabinet with membership from ALGA Leeton Shire Council/Forbes Shire Council)
18. Insurance Companies Assisting Families Affected by Fires
RESOLVED that Country Mayors advocate
(a) to the Commonwealth to extend rental relief to bushfire affected individuals and families who lost their primary dwelling in the 2019/20 bushfires and that are now renting temporary accommodation through their insurance policy where in most cases cover will increase after 12 months
(b) to insurance companies and the Insurance Council of Australia to extend the 12 month period of rental assistance available to those residents who have lost their primary dwelling in the 2019/20 bushfires (Shoalhaven City Council/Broken Hill City Council)
19. Next Meeting
Sydney Airport Corporation be invited to the next meeting
There being no further business the meeting closed at 12.58pm.
Cr Ken Keith
Chairman Country Mayor’s Association of NSW
Attachment c Local Government NSW Update
Ordinary Meeting of Council 25 November 2020